Literature DB >> 9008561

Defensible assessment of the competency of the practicing physician.

J P Cunnington1, E Hanna, J Turnhbull, T B Kaigas, G R Norman.   

Abstract

When a physician's license to practice is at stake, professional acceptance and legal challenge are concerns for an organization undertaking competency assessments for practicing physicians. In 1995 the Physician Review and Enhancement Program (PREP), a program of McMaster University sponsored by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, underwent an external review by evaluation experts. As a result, one of the four assessment tools, the Structured Office Oral, was dropped, as it was insufficiently structured to be reliable and because it did not add significantly to the other tools. The content of all assessment tools was revised based on a PREP-developed blueprint for family practice. The multiple-choice questions (MCQs) were upgraded through collaboration with Canada's physician-accrediting body, the Medical Council of Canada (MCC), by the physician assessors, who chose MCQs according to the blueprint from the MCC question bank. The standardized-patient assessment was also refined by these physicians, who developed scenarios of standardized clinical cases with predefined performance criteria. Finally, through collaboration with the American Board of Emergency Medicine, a chart-stimulated recall test, in which the physician's own patient records are used to assess the physician's practice behavior, was restructured to ensure objectivity in standardization and interpretation. The result of these changes in the assessment tools is a more standardized and structured program of assessing physicians' competencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9008561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  10 in total

Review 1.  Revalidation of doctors in Canada.

Authors:  W D Dauphinee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-30

2.  Structured teaching and assessment: a new chart-stimulated recall worksheet for family medicine residents.

Authors:  Shirley Schipper; Shelley Ross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  A Case for Caution: Chart-Stimulated Recall.

Authors:  Shalini T Reddy; Justin Endo; Shanu Gupta; Ara Tekian; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  Maintaining standards in British and Canadian medicine: the developing role of the regulatory body.

Authors:  L Southgate; D Dauphinee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

5.  Defining the effect and mediators of two knowledge translation strategies designed to alter knowledge, intent and clinical utilization of rehabilitation outcome measures: a study protocol [NCT00298727].

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Patty Solomon; Mary Law; Dianne Russell; Paul Stratford
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Family physician practice visits arising from the Alberta Physician Achievement Review.

Authors:  Ray Lewkonia; Nigel Flook; Michel Donoff; Jocelyn Lockyer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  A randomized trial to identify accurate and cost-effective fidelity measurement methods for cognitive-behavioral therapy: project FACTS study protocol.

Authors:  Rinad S Beidas; Johanna Catherine Maclean; Jessica Fishman; Shannon Dorsey; Sonja K Schoenwald; David S Mandell; Judy A Shea; Bryce D McLeod; Michael T French; Aaron Hogue; Danielle R Adams; Adina Lieberman; Emily M Becker-Haimes; Steven C Marcus
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  A scoping review of the potential for chart stimulated recall as a clinical research method.

Authors:  Carol Sinnott; Martina A Kelly; Colin P Bradley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  "Push" versus "Pull" for mobilizing pain evidence into practice across different health professions: a protocol for a randomized trial.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Mary Law; Norman Buckley; Robert Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Implementing nudges for suicide prevention in real-world environments: project INSPIRE study protocol.

Authors:  Molly Davis; Courtney Benjamin Wolk; Shari Jager-Hyman; Rinad S Beidas; Jami F Young; Jennifer A Mautone; Alison M Buttenheim; David S Mandell; Kevin G Volpp; Katherine Wislocki; Anne Futterer; Darby Marx; E L Dieckmeyer; Emily M Becker-Haimes
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-09-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.