Literature DB >> 9007598

Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.

P Kempf1, A Bauernfeind, A Müller, J Blum.   

Abstract

In an open, randomised, multicentre trial, the efficacy and tolerability of empirical meropenem monotherapy (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) and cefotaxime (2 g every 8 hours) plus metronidazole (0.5 g intravenously every 8 hours) for 5 to 10 days was compared in 94 patients with serious intra-abdominal infection who required surgery. Eighty-three patients had an evaluable clinical response. Significantly more patients in the meropenem group had a satisfactory clinical response at the end of treatment (41/43 [95.3%] vs 30/40 [75.0%]; p = 0.008). The bacteriological response was also higher in the meropenem group (31/33 vs 26/32). In the bacteriologically evaluable population, a satisfactory clinical response was observed in 31/33 of those who received meropenem compared to 24/32 of the cefotaxime/metronidazole recipients (p = 0.03). Empirical meropenem monotherapy should prove a useful alternative to the currently standard combination treatment for serious intraabdominal infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9007598     DOI: 10.1007/bf01713053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  13 in total

Review 1.  Drug therapy. Beta-lactam antibiotics (2).

Authors:  G R Donowitz; G L Mandell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  In-vitro activity of meropenem imipenem, the penem HRE 664 and ceftazidine against clinical isolates from West Germany.

Authors:  A Bauernfeind; R Jungwirth; S Schweighart
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  Wound and intraabdominal infections: microbiological considerations and approaches to treatment.

Authors:  R L Nichols; J W Smith
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a review of worldwide experience.

Authors:  L Kager; C E Nord
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

5.  Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; A S Malmborg; G Tunevall; V Lindgren; L Bergman; L O Mentzing; P O Nyström; S Anséhn; B Bäckstrand; T Skau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Antibiotic monotherapy with meropenem in the surgical management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  W K Huizinga; B L Warren; L W Baker; P Valleur; D M Pezet; J A Hoogkamp-Korstanjep; S J Karran
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  [Comparison of 2 antibiotic combinations used for peritonitis. Cefotaxime-clindamycin versus cefotaxime-metronidazole].

Authors:  X Barth; H Hayoun; P Rat; J P Hoen; J P Favre; R Lombard-Platet
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1991-01-19       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 8.  Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  S E Wilson
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1995

9.  Monotherapy for fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: a randomized comparison of ceftazidime versus imipenem.

Authors:  A G Freifeld; T Walsh; D Marshall; J Gress; S M Steinberg; J Hathorn; M Rubin; P Jarosinski; V Gill; R C Young
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  In vitro antibacterial activity of SM-7338, a carbapenem antibiotic with stability to dehydropeptidase I.

Authors:  J R Edwards; P J Turner; C Wannop; E S Withnell; A J Grindey; K Nairn
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Canadian practice guidelines for surgical intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  Anthony W Chow; Gerald A Evans; Avery B Nathens; Chad G Ball; Glen Hansen; Godfrey Km Harding; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Karl Weiss; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Meropenem. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in serious infections.

Authors:  S M Holliday; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Meropenem: an updated review of its use in the management of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  M N Lowe; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Meropenem: a review of its use in the treatment of serious bacterial infections.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Optimal Treatment for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Therapy With Metronidazole.

Authors:  Hiroshige Mikamo; Akira Yuasa; Keiko Wada; Bruce Crawford; Naomi Sugimoto
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  Carbapenems vs β-Lactam Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yan Li; Lingyuan Chen; Junsong Jiang; Xianshu Li; Tianguo Huang; Xueyan Liang
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.835

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.