Literature DB >> 7652500

Carbapenems: monotherapy in intra-abdominal sepsis.

S E Wilson1.   

Abstract

Meropenem is the first of a new class of dehydropeptidase-stable carbapenems which is highly active against the microflora associated with intra-abdominal infection. Three randomised, prospective multicentre studies, have compared meropenem monotherapy with imipenem/cilastatin and cefotaxime plus metronidazole in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections: meropenem (1 g) versus cefotaxime (2 g) plus metronidazole (500 mg); meropenem (1 g) versus imipenem/cilastatin (1 g); meropenem (500 mg) versus imipenem/cilastatin (500 mg), all administered intravenously every 8 hours. Of the 641 patients with intra-abdominal infections randomised to treatment, 555 (87%) were clinically evaluable and 445 (69%) were bacteriologically evaluable. At the end of treatment a majority of the patients in each of the 3 studies was clinically cured or improved (91-100%). There were no clinically significant differences between the treatment regimens. Meropenem was effective over a range of intra-abdominal infections and as well tolerated as imipenem/cilastatin, and cefotaxime plus metronidazole.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7652500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of newer quinolones for the treatment of intraabdominal infections: focus on clinafloxacin.

Authors:  C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; B Schubert; W Ebner; F Daschner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Meropenem monotherapy versus cefotaxime plus metronidazole combination treatment for serious intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  P Kempf; A Bauernfeind; A Müller; J Blum
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin-Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam).

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Giorgio Ercolani; Salomone Di Saverio; Filippo Gazzotti; Daniel Lazzareschi; Antonio D Pinna
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  T.E.A. Study: three-day ertapenem versus three-day Ampicillin-Sulbactam.

Authors:  Fausto Catena; Carlo Vallicelli; Luca Ansaloni; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Riccardo Schiavina; Eddi Pasqualini; Annalisa Amaduzzi; Federico Coccolini; Michele Cucchi; Daniel Lazzareschi; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Antonio D Pinna
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.067

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.