Literature DB >> 9006685

The diagnosis of meniscal tears in athletes. A comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging investigations.

T Muellner1, R Weinstabl, R Schabus, V Vécsei, F Kainberger.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the predictability of clinical examination alone in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears in competitive athletes. Ninety-three competitive athletes were prospectively investigated between 1992 and 1995. A total of 57 athletes were operated on based on clinical examination alone, and the 36 remaining athletes had magnetic resonance imaging before surgery. The correct diagnosis of a meniscal lesion was made on clinical examination alone in 83 athletes (89%) and on magnetic resonance imaging the correct diagnosis was also made in 89% of 36 athletes. The overall values for the clinical investigation of the medial and lateral menisci combined were 94.5%, 91.5%, 99%, 96.5%, 87% for accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively. The overall values for magnetic resonance imaging of the medial and lateral menisci combined were 95.5%, 96.5%, 91.5%, 98%, 85.5% for accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9006685     DOI: 10.1177/036354659702500103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  11 in total

Review 1.  The menisci: basic science and advances in treatment.

Authors:  E Rath; J C Richmond
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Do physical diagnostic tests accurately detect meniscal tears?

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Faizal Rayan; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Validity of the McMurray's Test and Modified Versions of the Test: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Wayne Hing; Steve White; Duncan Reid; Rob Marshall
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

4.  Early magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injury: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Nirav K Patel; Andrew Bucknill; David Ahearne; Janet Denning; Kailash Desai; Martin Watson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Recommendations for the diagnosis of traumatic meniscal injuries in athletes.

Authors:  T Muellner; A Nikolic; V Vécsei
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of meniscus posterior root pathology.

Authors:  Robert F LaPrade; Charles P Ho; Evan James; Bernardo Crespo; Christopher M LaPrade; Lauren M Matheny
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  [Value of the clinical examination in suspected meniscal injuries. A meta-analysis].

Authors:  B Ockert; F Haasters; H Polzer; S Grote; M A Kessler; W Mutschler; K-G Kanz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Anatomy and physical examination of the knee menisci: a narrative review of the orthopedic literature.

Authors:  Michael D Chivers; Scott D Howitt
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2009-12

9.  Joint line fullness and meniscal pathology.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Couture; Wazzan Al-Juhani; Michael E Forsythe; Eric Lenczner; Robert Marien; Mark Burman
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in the community setting.

Authors:  Jolene C Hardy; Gregory T Evangelista; William A Grana; Robert E Hunter
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.