Literature DB >> 19960176

[Value of the clinical examination in suspected meniscal injuries. A meta-analysis].

B Ockert1, F Haasters, H Polzer, S Grote, M A Kessler, W Mutschler, K-G Kanz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The physical examination of the knee in cases of suspected meniscal tears serves to increase the probability of a correct diagnosis. Although there is a large variety of functional tests, the quality of each diagnostic test is controversially discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a systematic literature search in Medline and the Cochrane Database two reviewers independently screened publications, evaluated each study for methodological quality and categorized them into levels of evidence (CEBM). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predicted value, as well as positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+/LR-) values were calculated in order to render the quality threshold of the physical examination in meniscus impairment.
RESULTS: The Thessaly test (sensitivity: 91%, specificity: 97%, PPV: 97%, NPV: 91% LR+: 31.1, LR-: 0.1) revealed the highest test quality. Limited quality was shown for the Mc Murray test (sensitivity: 51%, specificity: 78%, PPV: 70%, NPV: 61%, LR+: 2.3, LR-: 0.6), "joint line tenderness" (sensitivity: 64%, specificity: 61%, PPV: 62%, NPV: 63%, LR+: 1.6, LR-: 0.6), the Apley-Grinding test (sensitivity: 38%, specificity: 84%, PPV: 71%, NPV: 58%, LR+: 2.4, LR-: 0.7) and the Ege test (sensitivity: 66%, specificity: 86%, PPV: 83%, NPV: 72%, LR+: 4.7, LR-: 0.4). Evidence for Steinman's test, Bragard's test and the meniscal signs of Böhler or Payr could not be tested.
CONCLUSION: Meniscal injury can be detected by several functional tests. Using the Thessaly test can improve the physical examination by means of probability of the correct diagnosis, but the results are based on a single study. In patients with ambiguous findings in the physical examination or with suspected combined injury, further diagnostic procedures such as magnetic resonance imaging are necessary to confirm the diagnosis. In clinically certain cases the use of additional diagnostic imaging procedures should be avoided as other authors have shown that with few exceptions this has no influence on the therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19960176     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-009-1702-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  36 in total

1.  The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Yavuz Kocabey; Onur Tetik; William M Isbell; O Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Statistical evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for meniscal tears.

Authors:  P Abdon; A Lindstrand; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Making sense of diagnostic test likelihood ratios.

Authors:  Raphael Perera; Carl Heneghan
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

4.  Is there a role for sonography in the diagnosis of tears of the knee menisci?

Authors:  Roberto Azzoni; Paolo Cabitza
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  The diagnosis of meniscal tears in athletes. A comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging investigations.

Authors:  T Muellner; R Weinstabl; R Schabus; V Vécsei; F Kainberger
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  [Examination of the knee joint. The value of clinical findings in arthroscopic control].

Authors:  K Steinbrück; J C Wiehmann
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1988 May-Jun

7.  McMurray's test tested.

Authors:  J R Corea; M Moussa; A al Othman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Knee pain and disability in the community.

Authors:  T E McAlindon; C Cooper; J R Kirwan; P A Dieppe
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1992-03

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of knee disorders. Clinical value and cost-effectiveness in a sports medicine practice.

Authors:  H J Gelb; S G Glasgow; A A Sapega; J S Torg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Acute haemarthrosis of the knee in athletes. A prospective study of 106 cases.

Authors:  N Maffulli; P M Binfield; J B King; C J Good
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  A clinical prediction rule for meniscal tears in primary care: development and internal validation using a multicentre study.

Authors:  Barbara Am Snoeker; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Cees Lucas; Robert Lindeboom
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.