Literature DB >> 9003133

Healthy behaviors among women in the United States and Ontario: the effect on use of preventive care.

T P Hofer1, S J Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined how several healthy behaviors among women in Ontario and the United States explained (1) the use of preventive health services, (2) differences in use between socioeconomic groups, and (3) differences in use between the two health systems.
METHODS: 1990 data on women from the Ontario Health Survey (n = 22,985) and the US National Health Interview Survey (n = 19,092) were analyzed. A woman who avoided smoking and obesity, used seatbelts, and regularly engaged in aerobic exercise was defined as having a healthy lifestyle. Women were considered screened if they reported a mammogram or a breast exam within the previous year or a Pap smear within 2 years.
RESULTS: A healthy lifestyle was more common in the United States than Canada among more highly educated groups (odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22, 1.60 for college educated) but less common in the United States for those with less than a high school education (OR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.67). Each additional unhealthy behavior decreased the odds of having undergone a mammogram in the previous year by 20%. However, adjusting for the number of unhealthy behaviors did not substantially change the relationship between socioeconomic status and use of preventive services.
CONCLUSIONS: The number of healthy behaviors is an important measure of demand for preventive health services. This measure varies across country and socioeconomic group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9003133      PMCID: PMC1380729          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.86.12.1755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  19 in total

Review 1.  The measurement of social class in epidemiology.

Authors:  P Liberatos; B G Link; J L Kelsey
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Social stratification and health lifestyles in two systems of health care delivery: a comparison of the United States and West Germany.

Authors:  W C Cockerham; G Kunz; G Lueschen
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1988-06

3.  Health promotion in the United States and Canada: smoking, exercise, and other health-related behaviors.

Authors:  C A Schoenborn; T Stephens
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Socioeconomic status and preventive health behavior.

Authors:  D Coburn; C R Pope
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1974-06

Review 5.  Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  The national profile of access to medical care: where do we stand?

Authors:  L A Aday; R M Andersen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Social status and health risks in Canadian adults: 1985 and 1991.

Authors:  W J Millar; T Stephens
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.796

8.  Health practices and disability: some evidence from Alameda County.

Authors:  L Breslow; N Breslow
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  The relationship of lifestyle to international trends in CHD.

Authors:  F H Epstein
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  19 in total

1.  The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; E Shtatland; R Bright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Delivering equitable care: comparing preventive services in Manitoba.

Authors:  Sumit Gupta; Leslie L Roos; Randy Walld; Dawn Traverse; Matthew Dahl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Access to care: remembering old lessons.

Authors:  Catherine G McLaughlin; Leon Wyszewianski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Predictors of compliance with recommended cervical cancer screening schedule: a population-based study.

Authors:  E J Simoes; C J Newschaffer; N Hagdrup; F Ali-Abarghoui; X Tao; N Mack; R C Brownson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-04

5.  Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  S Lemon; J Zapka; E Puleo; R Luckmann; L Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Associations of race, education, and patterns of preventive service use with stage of cancer at time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Marian E Gornick; Paul W Eggers; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Patricia A Carney; Linn A Abraham; William E Barlow; Joseph R Egger; Jessica S Fosse; Gary R Cutter; R Edward Hendrick; Carl J D'Orsi; Prashni Paliwal; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

9.  Using the National Health Interview Survey to understand and address the impact of tobacco in the United States: past perspectives and future considerations.

Authors:  Cathy L Backinger; Deirdre Lawrence; Judith Swan; Deborah M Winn; Nancy Breen; Anne Hartman; Rachel Grana; David Tran; Samantha Farrell
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2008-12-04

10.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.