Literature DB >> 9000740

Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility.

I M Noordhoek1, R Drullman.   

Abstract

Modulations in the temporal intensity envelope of 24 1/4-octave bands were reduced by proportionally raising the troughs and lowering the peaks relative to the mean intensity in each band. The effect on intelligibility of various degrees of modulation reduction was investigated by measuring the speech-reception threshold (SRT) in noise. For conditions of severe modulation reduction, the number of correctly received sentences in quiet was scored. The effect of this deterministic modulation reduction was compared to the effect of stochastic modulation reduction obtained with addition of noise. Results for 12 normal-hearing subjects show that in the case of deterministic modulation reduction, intelligibility is reduced to 50% when the modulation-transfer factor equals 0.10, whereas in the case of modulation reduction by addition of noise, this intelligibility is reached already at a modulation-transfer factor of 0.27. This confirms that the effect of additive noise on intelligibility cannot be understood completely as a result of only modulation reduction. As suggested by Drullman [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 585-592 (1995)] two other factors associated with the addition of noise have to be taken into account: (1) the introduction of nonrelevant modulations, and (2) the corruption of the fine structure.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9000740     DOI: 10.1121/1.417993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Forward masking in the amplitude-modulation domain for tone carriers: psychophysical results and physiological correlates.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Paul C Nelson; Neal F Viemeister; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23

Review 2.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

5.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Application of the envelope difference index to spectrally sparse speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.

Authors:  Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza; James Kates; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Amplification and consonant modulation spectra.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen; Sara E Fultz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.

Authors:  Borys Kowalewski; Johannes Zaar; Michal Fereczkowski; Ewen N MacDonald; Olaf Strelcyk; Tobias May; Torsten Dau
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.