Literature DB >> 8998945

Workshop overview. National Toxicology Program Studies: principles of dose selection and applications to mechanistic based risk assessment.

J R Bucher1, C J Portier, J I Goodman, E M Faustman, G W Lucier.   

Abstract

A workshop entitled "NTP Studies: Principles of Dose Selection and Applications to Mechanistic Based Risk Assessment" was held at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society of Toxicology in Baltimore, Maryland. The purpose of the workshop was to provide an overview of factors currently considered important in the selection of doses for NTP studies, to describe some of the confounding factors that can result from the indiscriminate use of bioassay data in quantitative risk assessment, and to suggest ways in which information from mechanistic studies or studies of biomarkers of exposure or effect might be used to better advantage in risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8998945     DOI: 10.1006/faat.1996.0070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0272-0590


  8 in total

1.  DETERMINING DISEASE CAUSALITY FROM EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES.

Authors:  Ronald L Melnick; John R Bucher
Journal:  J Law Policy       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Application of genomics to toxicology research.

Authors:  Russell S Thomas; David R Rank; Sharron G Penn; Gina M Zastrow; Kevin R Hayes; Tianhua Hu; Kalyan Pande; Mark Lewis; Stevan B Jovanovich; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Pulmonary carcinogenicity of inhaled particles and the maximum tolerated dose.

Authors:  G Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  The traditional toxicologic paradigm is correct: dose influences mechanism.

Authors:  J I Goodman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Animal and human carcinogens.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Using the concordance of in vitro and in vivo data to evaluate extrapolation assumptions.

Authors:  Gregory S Honda; Robert G Pearce; Ly L Pham; R W Setzer; Barbara A Wetmore; Nisha S Sipes; Jon Gilbert; Briana Franz; Russell S Thomas; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Conflicting views on chemical carcinogenesis arising from the design and evaluation of rodent carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  Ronald L Melnick; Kristina A Thayer; John R Bucher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.