Literature DB >> 8998318

[The efficacy of lead shielding in patient dosage reduction in computed tomography].

N Hidajat1, R J Schröder, T Vogl, H Schedel, R Felix.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Investigation of the efficacy of lead apron, testis capsule and thyroid collar for dose reduction in uterus, ovaries, testes and thyroid gland in computed tomography examinations.
METHODS: At an Alderson-Rando phantom dose of uterus, ovaries, testes and thyroid gland was measured with thermoluminescent dose meters. CT of the upper abdomen, the whole abdomen and the skull were simulated without and with lead shielding. As lead shielding, a lead apron was attached around the pelvis of the phantom in case of CT of the upper abdomen, a testis capsule was used in CT of the whole abdomen and a thyroid collar in CT of the skull.
RESULTS: In CT of the upper abdomen the lead apron did not lead to any recognisable dose reduction in uterus and ovaries. In CT of the whole abdomen the testis capsule led to a dose reduction in testes of 95% (1.39 mSv) and in CT of the skull the thyroid collar to a dose reduction in thyroid gland of 23% (0.19 mSv).
CONCLUSIONS: In abdominal CT examinations the testis capsule is an important instrument to reduce the dose of the testes whereas the lead apron is not appropriate for a dose reduction in the uterus and ovaries. In CT of the skull the thyroid collar can remarkably reduce the scattered radiation exposure of the thyroid gland and should be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8998318     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1015790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  12 in total

1.  Radiosensitive tissues can be shielded during CT scanning.

Authors:  R Price; C Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

2.  Efficacy of breast shielding during CT of the head.

Authors:  Z Brnić; B Vekić; A Hebrang; P Anić
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Organ and effective dose reduction in adult chest CT using abdominal lead shielding.

Authors:  G R Iball; D S Brettle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose].

Authors:  S T Schindera; C Nauer; R Treier; P Trueb; G von Allmen; P Vock; Z Szucs-Farkas
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Clinical indications and radiation doses to the conceptus associated with CT imaging in pregnancy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  S Woussen; X Lopez-Rendon; D Vanbeckevoort; H Bosmans; R Oyen; F Zanca
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Effectiveness of abdominal shields in chest radiography: a Monte Carlo evaluation.

Authors:  Yuri V Matyagin; Peter J Collins
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  CT dose reduction in children.

Authors:  Peter Vock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Computed tomography dose optimisation in cystic fibrosis: A review.

Authors:  Helena Ferris; Maria Twomey; Fiachra Moloney; Siobhan B O'Neill; Kevin Murphy; Owen J O'Connor; Michael Maher
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

9.  Dose management in CT facility.

Authors:  V Tsapaki; M Rehani
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-04-01

Review 10.  Radiation exposure from chest CT: issues and strategies.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Stefania Rizzo; David Kanarek; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Jo-Anne O Shephard
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.