Literature DB >> 8993985

Reproducibility of left ventricular size, shape and mass with echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide angiography in patients with anterior wall infarction. A plea for core laboratories.

L H Baur1, J J Schipperheyn, E A van der Velde, E E van der Wall, J H Reiber, R J van der Geest, P R van Dijkman, J G Gerritsen, B L van Eck-Smit, P J Voogd, A V Bruschke.   

Abstract

After myocardial infarction, left ventricular volume and ejection fraction can be assessed by echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide angiography to guide therapy and determine prognosis. Whether a measured parameter gives the same results irrespective of the method used and the observer who performs the analysis is only partly known. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability were determined for echo and magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by these techniques was related to radionuclide angiograms performed in the same period. Intra-observer variability for both echo and MRI was low and in most instances below 5%. Inter-observer variability for the echo and MRI measurements were substantially higher than intra-observer variability. Comparison of the three imaging modalities revealed systematic differences. Therefore, in clinical studies, left ventricular volume and function parameters have to be measured with the same technique and by the same observer in qualified core laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8993985     DOI: 10.1007/bf01797736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  25 in total

1.  Estimation of left ventricular cavity area with an on-line, semiautomated echocardiographic edge detection system.

Authors:  B F Vandenberg; L S Rath; P Stuhlmuller; H E Melton; D J Skorton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Echocardiography in serial evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function: importance of image acquisition, quantitation, and physiologic variability in clinical and investigational applications.

Authors:  H F Kuecherer; L L Kee; G Modin; M D Cheitlin; N B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms.

Authors:  N B Schiller; P M Shah; M Crawford; A DeMaria; R Devereux; H Feigenbaum; H Gutgesell; N Reichek; D Sahn; I Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Reproducibility of the angiographic left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  P F Cohn; J A Levine; G A Bergeron; R Gorlin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Treatment of patients with symptomless left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Sharpe; J Murphy; H Smith; S Hannan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Application of cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging for sequential evaluation of response to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  N E Doherty; K C Seelos; J Suzuki; G R Caputo; M O'Sullivan; S M Sobol; P Cavero; K Chatterjee; W W Parmley; C B Higgins
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Reproducibility of echocardiography. A study evaluating the variability of serial echocardiographic measurements.

Authors:  D A Pietro; A G Voelkel; B J Ray; A F Parisi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; P W Brandt; R M Whitlock; C J Wild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. The protective effects of captopril.

Authors:  M St John Sutton; M A Pfeffer; T Plappert; J L Rouleau; L A Moyé; G R Dagenais; G A Lamas; M Klein; B Sussex; S Goldman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  12 in total

1.  Estimation of the right ventricular volume and ejection fraction by transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. A validation study using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Fujimoto; R Mizuno; Y Nakagawa; K Dohi; H Nakano
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-12

2.  Comparison of radionuclide angiography with three echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular function in patients after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A W van 't Hof; C W Schipper; J G Gerritsen; S Reiffers; J C Hoorntje
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1998-12

3.  Evaluation of left ventricular endocardial volumes and ejection fractions computed from gated perfusion SPECT with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of two methods.

Authors:  T L Faber; J P Vansant; R I Pettigrew; J R Galt; M Blais; G Chatzimavroudis; C D Cooke; R D Folks; S M Waldrop; E Gurtler-Krawczynska; M D Wittry; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echo and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  S Prasad; D Pennell
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Evaluation of left ventricular function: does the imaging technique matter?

Authors:  Leo H B Baur
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Predictors of coronary artery visualization in Kawasaki disease.

Authors:  Renee Margossian; Minmin Lu; L LuAnn Minich; Timothy J Bradley; Meryl S Cohen; Jennifer S Li; Beth F Printz; Girish S Shirali; Lynn A Sleeper; Jane W Newburger; Steven D Colan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.251

7.  Left ventricular mass assessment by CMR; how to define the optimal index.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; J J Bax
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Effect of core laboratory and multiple-reader interpretation of angiographic images on follow-up outcomes of coiled cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Rezek; G Mousan; Z Wang; M H Murad; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Differences in the angiographic evaluation of coiled cerebral aneurysms between a core laboratory reader and operators: results of the Cerecyte Coil Trial.

Authors:  I Rezek; R K Lingineni; M Sneade; A J Molyneux; A J Fox; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Assessment of left ventricular function with steady-state-free-precession magnetic resonance imaging. Reference values and a comparison to left ventriculography.

Authors:  O Grebe; H A Kestler; N Merkle; J Wöhrle; M Kochs; M Höher; V Hombach
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.