BACKGROUND: Dual-isotope rest/stress single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging is a time-saving imaging protocol. However, the stress radiotracer, technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi, and the rest radiotracer, thallium 201, have different physical properties and myocardial kinetics. In patients with abnormal resting myocardial perfusion, these differences may affect quantification of rest defect size and defect reversibility. The purpose of the study was to compare myocardial perfusion defect reversibility quantitatively by single-isotope (rest/stress sestamibi) and dual-isotope (rest thallium/stress sestamibi) SPECT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with prior myocardial infarction underwent rest/stress sestamibi SPECT imaging and rest thallium SPECT imaging. Defects were quantified according to circumferential count profiles with a normal sestamibi database. The images of a subgroup of 21 patients were processed with radiotracer-specific normal databases. Defect size and defect reversibility were compared quantitatively for single-isotope and dual-isotope SPECT. Rest sestamibi defect size was significantly larger than rest thallium defect size (19 +/- 15 vs 14 +/- 16; p = 0.007). Defect reversibility was larger with thallium than with sestamibi (10 +/- 9 vs 6 +/- 6; p = 0.002). With radiotracer-specific normal databases, mean rest sestamibi and thallium defect sizes in 21 patients were not different (23 +/- 19 vs 21 +/- 17; difference not significant). With radiotracer-specific normal databases, mean defect reversibility was not different with either sestamibi or thallium (6 +/- 6 vs 8 +/- 9; difference not significant), although correlation among individual patients was only fair (r2 = 0.48). CONCLUSION: In patients with prior myocardial infarction, stress-induced defect reversibility is quantitatively larger with dual-isotope imaging than with single-isotope imaging. Quantitative processing of dual-isotope images requires radiotracer-specific normal databases. Because of different characteristics of sestamibi and thallium, assessment of defect reversibility on dual-isotope images should be made with caution. Only relatively large defect reversibility can be assumed to represent true stress-induced myocardial ischemia.
BACKGROUND: Dual-isotope rest/stress single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging is a time-saving imaging protocol. However, the stress radiotracer, technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi, and the rest radiotracer, thallium 201, have different physical properties and myocardial kinetics. In patients with abnormal resting myocardial perfusion, these differences may affect quantification of rest defect size and defect reversibility. The purpose of the study was to compare myocardial perfusion defect reversibility quantitatively by single-isotope (rest/stress sestamibi) and dual-isotope (rest thallium/stress sestamibi) SPECT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with prior myocardial infarction underwent rest/stress sestamibi SPECT imaging and rest thallium SPECT imaging. Defects were quantified according to circumferential count profiles with a normal sestamibi database. The images of a subgroup of 21 patients were processed with radiotracer-specific normal databases. Defect size and defect reversibility were compared quantitatively for single-isotope and dual-isotope SPECT. Rest sestamibi defect size was significantly larger than rest thallium defect size (19 +/- 15 vs 14 +/- 16; p = 0.007). Defect reversibility was larger with thallium than with sestamibi (10 +/- 9 vs 6 +/- 6; p = 0.002). With radiotracer-specific normal databases, mean rest sestamibi and thallium defect sizes in 21 patients were not different (23 +/- 19 vs 21 +/- 17; difference not significant). With radiotracer-specific normal databases, mean defect reversibility was not different with either sestamibi or thallium (6 +/- 6 vs 8 +/- 9; difference not significant), although correlation among individual patients was only fair (r2 = 0.48). CONCLUSION: In patients with prior myocardial infarction, stress-induced defect reversibility is quantitatively larger with dual-isotope imaging than with single-isotope imaging. Quantitative processing of dual-isotope images requires radiotracer-specific normal databases. Because of different characteristics of sestamibi and thallium, assessment of defect reversibility on dual-isotope images should be made with caution. Only relatively large defect reversibility can be assumed to represent true stress-induced myocardial ischemia.
Authors: J K Kahn; I McGhie; M S Akers; M N Sills; T L Faber; P V Kulkarni; J T Willerson; J R Corbett Journal: Circulation Date: 1989-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Maurea; A Cuocolo; A Soricelli; L Castelli; A Nappi; F Squame; M Imbriaco; B Trimarco; M Salvatore Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: H L Haronian; M S Remetz; A J Sinusas; J M Baron; H I Miller; M W Cleman; B L Zaret; F J Wackers Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: J C Maublant; X Marcaggi; J R Lusson; J Y Boire; J C Cauvin; P Jacob; A Veyre; J Cassagnes Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1992-01-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Robert A de Kemp; Frederick H Epstein; Ciprian Catana; Benjamin M W Tsui; Erik L Ritman Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: A Elhendy; R T van Domburg; J J Bax; P R Nierop; R Valkema; M L Geleijnse; J D Kasprzak; A F Liqui-Lung; J H Cornel; J R Roelandt Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952