Literature DB >> 8986573

Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion.

C R Bragdon1, D Burke, J D Lowenstein, D O O'Connor, B Ramamurti, M Jasty, W H Harris.   

Abstract

To determine the mechanical properties of the interface between the tissue ingrowth into porous coatings and the implant, porous-coated cylindrical implants were inserted into the distal femur in 20 mature dogs and oscillated in vivo 8 hours per day for 6 weeks at fixed amounts of micromotion (0, 20, 40 and 150 microns). Applied torques and resulting displacements were recorded. The torsional resistance per unit angular displacement (TR/AD), reflecting the stiffness of the bone-porous coating interface, was 0.88 +/- 0.25 N-M/deg immediately after implantation in the 20-micron displacement group. It increased with time after surgery, reaching a maximum of 1.25 +/- 0.60 N-M/deg at 6 weeks. The TR/AD was lower initially (0.77 +/- 0.43 N-M/deg) in the 40-micron group and gradually decreased with time after surgery, reaching a maximum of 0.54 +/- 0.13 N-M/deg at 6 weeks. The TR/AD was even lower (0.24 +/- 0.10 N-M/deg) in the 150-micron group initially and remained the same (0.16 +/- 0.09 N-M/deg) with time after surgery. Histologic evaluation showed bone ingrowth in continuity with the surrounding bone in the 20-micron group consistent with the high stiffness values at sacrifice. In contrast, a mixture of fibrocallus and bone were found at the bone-porous coating interface in the 40-micron group, consistent with the intermediate stiffness values. In contrast, despite the fact that bone was found in the depth of the porous coating in the dogs in the 150-micron group, the low stiffness values were a reflection of fibrous tissue formation at the interface in that group, because of the large motion disrupting bony ingrowth at the bone-porous coating interface. By monitoring the torsional resistance per unit of angular displacement dynamically in vivo, it was possible to evaluate the mechanical properties of the bone-porous coating interface as tissue ingrowth proceeded. Twenty microns of oscillating displacement was compatible with stable bone ingrowth with high interface stiffness, whereas 40 and 150 microns of motion was not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986573     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80136-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

1.  Effect of the initial implant fitting on the predicted secondary stability of a cementless stem.

Authors:  M Viceconti; A Pancanti; M Dotti; F Traina; L Cristofolini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Cancellous bone osseointegration is enhanced by in vivo loading.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Xu Yang; Natalie H Kelly; Jane Han; Turya Nair; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Emerging ideas: Instability-induced periprosthetic osteolysis is not dependent on the fibrous tissue interface.

Authors:  Denis Nam; Mathias P G Bostrom; Anna Fahlgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Intermittent Parathyroid Hormone Enhances Cancellous Osseointegration of a Novel Murine Tibial Implant.

Authors:  Xu Yang; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Aleksey Dvorzhinskiy; Caroline Brial; Zachary Lane; Samrath Bhimani; Jayme C Burket; Bin Hu; Alexander M Sarkisian; F Patrick Ross; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair.

Authors:  Rachit Agarwal; Andrés J García
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Validation of FE micromotions and strains around a press-fit cup: introducing a new micromotion measuring technique.

Authors:  S G Clarke; A T M Phillips; A M J Bull
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Laser Sintering Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jeremy N DiNoro; Naomi C Paxton; Jacob Skewes; Zhilian Yue; Philip M Lewis; Robert G Thompson; Stephen Beirne; Maria A Woodruff; Gordon G Wallace
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.967

10.  Micromotion-induced strain fields influence early stages of repair at bone-implant interfaces.

Authors:  Rima M Wazen; Jennifer A Currey; Hongqiang Guo; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.