Literature DB >> 8986395

The role of implant surface characteristics in the healing of bone.

K Kieswetter1, Z Schwartz, D D Dean, B D Boyan.   

Abstract

The surface of an implant determines its ultimate ability to integrate into the surrounding tissue. The composite effect of surface energy, composition, roughness, and topography plays a major role during the initial phases of the biological response to the implant, such as protein adsorption and cellular adherence, as well as during the later and more chronic phases of the response. For bone, the successful incorporation (and hence rigid fixation) of an alloplastic material within the surrounding bony bed is called osteointegration. The exact surface characteristics necessary for optimal osteointegration, however, remain to be elucidated. This review will focus on how surface characteristics, such as composition and roughness, affect cellular response to an implant material. Data from two different culture systems suggest that these characteristics play a significant role in the recruitment and maturation of cells along relevant differentiation pathways. In the case of osteointegration, if the implant surface is inappropriate or less than optimal, cells will be unable to produce the appropriate complement of autocrine and paracrine factors required for adequate stimulation of osteogenesis at the implant site. In contrast, if the surface is appropriate, cells at the implant surface will stimulate interactions between cells at the surface and those in distal tissues. This, in turn, will initiate a timely sequence of events which include cell proliferation, differentiation, matrix synthesis, and local factor production, thereby resulting in the successful incorporation of the implant into the surrounding bony tissue.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986395     DOI: 10.1177/10454411960070040301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med        ISSN: 1045-4411


  50 in total

1.  Electrochemical characterization and in-vitro bio-assessment of AZ31B and AZ91E alloys as biodegradable implant materials.

Authors:  Zia Ur Rahman; Luis Pompa; Waseem Haider
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Topographic features retained after antibiotic modification of Ti alloy surfaces: retention of topography with attachment of antibiotics.

Authors:  Constantinos Ketonis; Javad Parvizi; Christopher S Adams; Irving M Shapiro; Noreen J Hickok
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface: an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Mingdeng Rong; Lei Zhou; Zehong Gou; Andi Zhu; Dongfeng Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Direct write assembly of calcium phosphate scaffolds using a water-based hydrogel.

Authors:  J Franco; P Hunger; M E Launey; A P Tomsia; E Saiz
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  Rolando A Gittens; Taylor McLachlan; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Ye Cai; Simon Berner; Rina Tannenbaum; Zvi Schwartz; Kenneth H Sandhage; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  SEM and EDS investigation of a pyrolytic carbon covered C/C composite maxillofacial implant retrieved from the human body after 8 years.

Authors:  Béla Sebők; Gábor Kiss; Péter J Szabó; Dániel Rigler; Milán L Molnár; Gábor Dobos; Ferenc Réti; Hajnal Szőcs; Arpád F Joób; Sándor Bogdán; György Szabó
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  In situ formation of porous space maintainers in a composite tissue defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Allan M Henslee; Meng Shi; Simon Young; Nagi Demian; John A Jansen; Mark E Wong; Antonios G Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  The role of phospholipase D in osteoblast response to titanium surface microstructure.

Authors:  Mimi Fang; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Marco Wieland; David L Cochran; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Human-osteoblast proliferation and differentiation on grit-blasted and bioactive titanium for dental applications.

Authors:  C Aparicio; F J Gil; J A Planell; E Engel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.