Literature DB >> 8983542

Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery.

A Klassen1, C Jenkinson, R Fitzpatrick, T Goodacre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the health related quality of life of patients before and after aesthetic surgery.
DESIGN: A survey by questionnaire of patients before receiving surgery and 6 months after surgery. SAMPLE: 656 patients anticipating surgery were sent a preoperative questionnaire, to which 443 replied. Subsequently 259 of these received a postoperative questionnaire, of which 198 were returned. OUTCOME MEASURES: Health status was assessed using three standardised health status instruments (The Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) and the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale. Comparisons were made between the health status of the plastic surgery patients and that of a random sample of the general population.
RESULTS: Patients receiving breast reduction surgery experienced significant improvements on all three health status measures. Patients in all surgical groups experienced significant improvements in self-esteem.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving aesthetic surgery experience a wide range of physical, psychological and social problems. Surgery was shown be effective at addressing these problems. Health status assessment provides a valid and independent method for measuring the effects of such health care interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8983542     DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(96)90025-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  19 in total

1.  Contrasting evidence of the effectiveness of cosmetic surgery from two health related quality of life measures.

Authors:  A Klassen; R Fitzpatrick; C Jenkinson; T Goodacre
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Breast augmentation should be on the NHS: a discussion of the ethics of rationing.

Authors:  Ben Horner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Regulating cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  Clive Orton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-25

4.  Long-term quality of life changes after primary septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Olcay Cem Bulut; Frank Wallner; Dare Oladokun; Claire Kayser; Michaela Plath; Eric Schulz; Peter Karl Plinkert; Ingo Baumann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  [Otoplasty and quality of life].

Authors:  T Braun; A Berghaus
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The influence of reduction mammaplasty on dermato-psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Cemal Firat; Serkan Erbatur; Ahmet Hamdi Aytekin
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2012-08

Review 7.  A review of psychosocial outcomes for patients seeking cosmetic surgery.

Authors:  Roberta J Honigman; Katharine A Phillips; David J Castle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Outcome of erbium:yttrium aluminium garnet laser resurfacing treatments.

Authors:  R P Cole; D Widdowson; J C Moore
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 9.  Does cosmetic surgery improve psychosocial wellbeing?

Authors:  David J Castle; Roberta J Honigman; Katharine A Phillips
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Rhinoplasty - indications and techniques.

Authors:  Abel-Jan Tasman
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.