Literature DB >> 25527381

[Otoplasty and quality of life].

T Braun1, A Berghaus.   

Abstract

The main aim of every aesthetic surgery is to offer patients a subjective benefit. Today, the construct "health-related quality of life" (HRQOL) is considered one of the most important parameters in the evaluation of treatment. Several recent studies using validated tools to measure HRQOL show that otoplasty leads to a significant and long-lasting increase in the HRQOL of children and adults suffering from protruding ears. However, irreversible auricular deformities after failed otoplasty can be more emotionally draining for the patient than the preoperative state. The respective risk is higher when using cartilage rasping or cutting techniques compared with pure suture techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25527381     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-014-2957-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  39 in total

Review 1.  Complications of otoplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  G C Limandjaja; C C Breugem; A B Mink van der Molen; M Kon
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconceptualization.

Authors:  D B Sarwer; T A Wadden; M J Pertschuk; L A Whitaker
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01

3.  Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty--A study of 203 cases.

Authors:  A Mandal; H Bahia; T Ahmad; K J Stewart
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure.

Authors:  D Fischer; A L Stewart; D A Bloch; K Lorig; D Laurent; H Holman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Psychosocial outcome of patients after ear reconstruction: a retrospective study of 62 patients.

Authors:  Nigel Horlock; Esther Vögelin; Eileen T Bradbury; Adriaan O Grobbelaar; David T Gault
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Patient benefit from functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty.

Authors:  D C McKiernan; G Banfield; R Kumar; A E Hinton
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2001-02

7.  Auricular reconstruction with porous polyethylene frameworks: outcome and patient benefit in 65 children and adults.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; Sonja Gratza; Sven Becker; Ilona Schwentner; Klaus Stelter; Martin Patscheider; Alexander Berghaus; John Martin Hempel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery.

Authors:  A Klassen; C Jenkinson; R Fitzpatrick; T Goodacre
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1996-10

Review 9.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results.

Authors:  P A Adamson; B L McGraw; G J Tropper
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.