Literature DB >> 8983049

It takes a confounded face to pop out of a crowd.

D G Purcell1, A L Stewart, R B Skov.   

Abstract

It is widely reported that a picture of an angry face seems to figuratively pop out of an array of happy faces, although all of these reports are based on a single experiment by Hansen and Hansen. Pop out, when it occurs, indicates that an observer has located the target by means of a preattentive, parallel search. Hansen and Hansen concluded that it was the affect displayed by the face which caused it to pop out from its surrounding distracters. However, Hansen and Hansen's angry faces contained extraneous dark areas which were introduced when they transformed Ekman and Friesen's photographs of angry and happy faces into black-on-white sketches. When the original artifact-free gray-scaled versions of angry and happy faces were used no evidence for pop out was found. All target faces were found during a serial, self-terminating search regardless of their expression. The angry face in Hansen and Hansen's experiments may have popped out from a crowd of happy faces because of a contrast artifact inadvertently introduced when they created their stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8983049     DOI: 10.1068/p251091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  25 in total

1.  Threat sensitivity as assessed by automatic amygdala response to fearful faces predicts speed of visual search for facial expression.

Authors:  Patricia Ohrmann; Astrid Veronika Rauch; Jochen Bauer; Harald Kugel; Volker Arolt; Walter Heindel; Thomas Suslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Ingrid Scharlau; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

3.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

4.  Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Hyejin J Lee; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

5.  When two faces are not better than one: Serial limited-capacity processing with redundant-target faces.

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Victoria Lester; Riccardo Russo; R J Bowles; Alessio Pichler; Kevin Dutton
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2000-01-01

7.  Fur in the midst of the waters: visual search for material type is inefficient.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Loretta Myers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Older adults respond quickly to angry faces despite labeling difficulty.

Authors:  Ted Ruffman; Michelle Ng; Thomas Jenkin
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Facial expression recognition in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dianlong Hou; Baolan Wang; Jian Chen; Yingjuan Ma; Wenqing Xu; Xunyao Hou; Shuhong Pan; Xueping Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

Review 10.  Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.

Authors:  Qianru Xu; Chaoxiong Ye; Simeng Gu; Zhonghua Hu; Yi Lei; Xueyan Li; Lihui Huang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.