Literature DB >> 17484437

More efficient rejection of happy than of angry face distractors in visual search.

Gernot Horstmann1, Ingrid Scharlau, Ulrich Ansorge.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined whether the detection advantage for negative-face targets in crowds of positive-face distractors over positive-face targets in crowds of negative faces can be explained by differentially efficient distractor rejection. Search Condition A demonstrated more efficient distractor rejection with negative-face targets in positive-face crowds than vice versa. Search Condition B showed that target identity alone is not sufficient to account for this effect, because there was no difference in processing efficiency for positive- and negative-face targets within neutral crowds. Search Condition C showed differentially efficient processing with neutral-face targets among positive- or negative-face distractors. These results were obtained with both a within-participants (Experiment 1) and a between-participants (Experiment 2) design. The pattern of results is consistent with the assumption that efficient rejection of positive (more homogenous) distractors is an important determinant of performance in search among (face) distractors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17484437     DOI: 10.3758/bf03213927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  Asymmetries in visual search: an introduction.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

2.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion.

Authors:  J D Eastwood; D Smilek; P M Merikle
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

3.  Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual as well as emotional differences.

Authors:  Gernot Horstmann; Kirsten Borgstedt; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-02

4.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries.

Authors:  A Treisman; S Gormican
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.

Authors:  A Treisman; J Souther
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-09

7.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.

Authors:  C H Hansen; R D Hansen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

8.  Faces and facial expressions do not pop out.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently?

Authors:  Elaine Fox; Victoria Lester; Riccardo Russo; R J Bowles; Alessio Pichler; Kevin Dutton
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2000-01-01

10.  Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.

Authors:  J Yiend; A Mathews
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Measuring the emotion-specificity of rapid stimulus-driven attraction of attention to fearful faces: evidence from emotion categorization and a comparison with disgusted faces.

Authors:  Shah Khalid; Gernot Horstmann; Thomas Ditye; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-21

2.  Effects of alcohol on brain responses to social signals of threat in humans.

Authors:  Chandra Sekhar Sripada; Mike Angstadt; Patrick McNamara; Andrea C King; K Luan Phan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Measuring attentional biases for threat in children and adults.

Authors:  Vanessa LoBue
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  An asymmetric inhibition model of hemispheric differences in emotional processing.

Authors:  Gina M Grimshaw; David Carmel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 5.  Negative and Positive Bias for Emotional Faces: Evidence from the Attention and Working Memory Paradigms.

Authors:  Qianru Xu; Chaoxiong Ye; Simeng Gu; Zhonghua Hu; Yi Lei; Xueyan Li; Lihui Huang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.599

6.  The effects of valence and arousal on associative working memory and long-term memory.

Authors:  Heiko C Bergmann; Mark Rijpkema; Guillén Fernández; Roy P C Kessels
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Valence and arousal of words in visual and conceptual interference control efficiency.

Authors:  Kamil K Imbir; Maciej Pastwa; Marta Jankowska; Marcin Kosman; Aleksandra Modzelewska; Adrianna Wielgopolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.