Literature DB >> 34180033

When two faces are not better than one: Serial limited-capacity processing with redundant-target faces.

Daniel Fitousi1.   

Abstract

Many researchers believe that faces-whether presented alone or as part of an ensemble-are processed automatically. According to this idea, (a) the detection of single or multiple faces is resource free and does not require allocation of attention, and (b) visual search for faces is held in parallel. The current study put these hypotheses under direct scrutiny. Participants performed in a redundant target-detection task, responding according to the presence or absence of a face (or faces) on the display. I used a rigorous methodology known as the system factorial technology (SFT). The SFT methodology afforded simultaneous assessment of (a) architecture (serial vs. parallel), (b) stopping rule (exhaustive vs. self-terminating), and (c) capacity (limited, unlimited, or supercapacity). SFT analyses were held at the level of the mean RTs and at the level of the RT distributions. The analyses pointed conclusively to a serial self-terminating architecture with limited capacity. These findings cast serious doubts on the alleged automaticity of face perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face perception; Redundant target; SFT

Year:  2021        PMID: 34180033     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02335-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  40 in total

1.  Conditionally Selective Dependence of Random Variables on External Factors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

3.  Multisensory interaction in saccadic reaction time: a time-window-of-integration model.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Capacity limits for face processing.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Rob Jenkins
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-23

Review 5.  What is "special" about face perception?

Authors:  M J Farah; K D Wilson; M Drain; J N Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Face detection in peripheral vision: do faces pop out?

Authors:  V Brown; D Huey; J M Findlay
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 7.  Half a century of research on Garner interference and the separability-integrality distinction.

Authors:  Daniel Algom; Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.

Authors:  Xue Jun Cheng; Callum J McCarthy; Tony S L Wang; Thomas J Palmeri; Daniel R Little
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Understanding face recognition.

Authors:  V Bruce; A Young
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1986-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.