Literature DB >> 8979325

Regression of back and posterior pelvic pain after pregnancy.

H C Ostgaard1, E Roos-Hansson, G Zetherström.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective, consecutive cohort analysis of the regression of the incidence and intensity of back and posterior pelvic pain after delivery in pregnant women was done.
OBJECTIVE: To identify back and posterior pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to 5 months after delivery and to illustrate differences between these two pain types. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic back pain may start during a pregnancy, and regression of unspecified back pain after delivery may be slow and incomplete. Few studies have distinguished back pain from posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy, and no study has presented follow-up data after delivery with respect to pain types.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty four of 368 pregnant women studied had back or posterior pelvic pain and were offered individual group physiotherapy and training. The women were observed until 5 months after delivery. Standardized clinical examination protocols and questionnaires were used.
RESULTS: Posterior pelvic pain was experienced by 124 women, and back pain was experienced by 40 women during pregnancy. After delivery, however, back pain was more common. Pain intensity was higher among women with posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy, whereas after delivery pain intensity was higher among women with back pain. A correlation was found between the presence of high pain intensity during pregnancy and little regression of pain after delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: One of every three pregnant women studied experienced posterior pelvic pain, and one of every nine women experienced back pain. Posterior pelvic pain was more intense during pregnancy, and back pain was more intense and more common after delivery. High pain intensity in pregnancy indicated a bad prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8979325     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

Review 1.  How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards.

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Fabrizio Russo; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  P Katonis; A Kampouroglou; A Aggelopoulos; K Kakavelakis; S Lykoudis; A Makrigiannakis; K Alpantaki
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Lars Ladfors; Monika Fagevik Olsen; Hans-Christian Ostgaard; Henrik Hagberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-18

4.  Relations between pregnancy-related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marijke C P H Slieker ten Hove; Mark E Vierhout; Paul H Mulder; Jan J M Pool; Chris J Snijders; Rob Stoeckart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-01

5.  BMI, pain and hyper-mobility are determinants of long-term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy.

Authors:  Ingrid M Mogren
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Nina K Vøllestad; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Back pain in pregnancy: 1-year follow-up of untreated cases.

Authors:  L Padua; P Caliandro; I Aprile; C Pazzaglia; R Padua; A Calistri; P Tonali
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

Authors:  W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs.

Authors:  Annelie Gutke; Eva Roos Hansson; Gunilla Zetherström; Hans Christian Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Physical activity and persistent low back pain and pelvic pain post partum.

Authors:  Ingrid M Mogren
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.