Literature DB >> 19390876

Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs.

Annelie Gutke1, Eva Roos Hansson, Gunilla Zetherström, Hans Christian Ostgaard.   

Abstract

The classification of pelvic girdle pain can only be reached after lumbar causes have been excluded by a clinical examination. During clinical examination, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test is a well-established method for verifying pelvic girdle pain. However, a criticism of pelvic pain provocation tests is that they may have an effect on lumbar structures, thus yielding false-positive results. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test was performed with four groups of patients: patients with computed tomography-verified disc herniations (1) on the waiting list for surgery (14 women; 9 men); (2) 6 weeks after disc surgery (18 women, 12 men); (3) pregnant women seeking care for pelvic girdle pain (n = 25); and (4) women with persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery (n = 32). The sensitivity of the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.89. The positive predictive value was 0.89 and the negative predictive value was 0.87. Analysis of only women showed similar results. In our study, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was negative in patients with a well-defined lumbar diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, both before and after disc surgery. Our results are an important step toward the more accurate classification of lumbopelvic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19390876      PMCID: PMC2899577          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1003-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

1.  Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Ostgaard; G B Andersson; K Karlsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain.

Authors:  H Albert; M Godskesen; J Westergaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Incidence of four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain.

Authors:  Hanne B Albert; Mona Godskesen; Jes G Westergaard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Is pelvic pain in pregnancy a welfare complaint?

Authors:  K Björklund; S Bergström
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  The reliability of multitest regimens with sacroiliac pain provocation tests.

Authors:  Dirk J Kokmeyer; Peter Van der Wurff; Geert Aufdemkampe; Theresa C M Fickenscher
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lotta Norén; Solveig Ostgaard; Gun Johansson; Hans C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical examination of pelvic insufficiency during pregnancy. An evaluation of the interobserver variation, the relation between clinical signs and pain and the relation between clinical signs and physical disability.

Authors:  M Wormslev; A M Juul; B Marques; H Minck; L Bentzen; T M Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Diagnosing painful sacroiliac joints: A validity study of a McKenzie evaluation and sacroiliac provocation tests.

Authors:  Mark Laslett; Sharon B Young; Charles N Aprill; Barry McDonald
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2003

9.  Low-back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  A Fast; D Shapiro; E J Ducommun; L W Friedmann; T Bouklas; Y Floman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Andry Vleeming; Hanne B Albert; Hans Christian Ostgaard; Bengt Sturesson; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pelvic girdle pain--associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Marit B Veierød; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Evaluation of self-administered tests for pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  Monika Fagevik Olsén; Helen Elden; Annelie Gutke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain and Pregnancy Massage: Findings from a Subgroup Analysis of an Observational Study.

Authors:  Sarah Fogarty; Catherine McInerney; Phillipa Hay
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain, including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study.

Authors:  Francesca Wuytack; Annelie Gutke; Britt Stuge; Siv Mørkved; Christina Olsson; Hilde Stendal Robinson; Nina K Vøllestad; Birgitta Öberg; Lena Nilsson Wikmar; Juan Jose Saldaña Mena; Valerie Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Can a bothersome course of pelvic pain from mid-pregnancy to birth be predicted? A Norwegian prospective longitudinal SMS-Track study.

Authors:  Stefan Malmqvist; Inger Kjaermann; Knut Andersen; Anne Marie Gausel; Inger Økland; Jan Petter Larsen; Kolbjorn S Bronnick
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.