Literature DB >> 8977332

Diagnostic value of histology in non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

N E Schindlbeck1, B Wiebecke, A G Klauser, W A Voderholzer, S A Müller-Lissner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the absence of oesophageal erosions longterm pH monitoring is the present gold standard for diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). This method, however, is invasive, time consuming, expensive, and not generally available. AIMS: As histological changes have been described in GORD, this study looked at the possibility of whether the diagnosis of non-erosive reflux disease could be made by histological examination routinely during endoscopy.
SUBJECTS: A total of 24 prospectively selected patients with symptoms suggestive of GORD and seven healthy volunteers.
METHODS: Oesophageal erosions and other peptic lesions were excluded by oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy. Oesophageal pinch biopsy specimens were taken 2 cm and 5 cm above the oesophagogastric junction and evaluated blindly for the histological parameters cellular infiltration, basal zone hyperplasia, and papillary length. Twenty four hour pH monitoring was used as gold standard for the definition of reflux disease. It was abnormal in 13 patients (reflux patients) and normal in 11 patients (symptomatic controls) and in seven healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: Sparse infiltration of the epithelium with lymphocytes in at least one biopsy specimen was found in all patients and volunteers, with neutrophils in three reflux patients, and with eosinophils in two reflux patients and in two healthy volunteers. The basal zone thickness was increased in three reflux patients, in one symptomatic control, and in one healthy volunteer. The papillary length was greater than two thirds of total epithelium in six of 13 reflux patients in contrast with none in 11 symptomatic controls (p < 0.05) and to one healthy volunteer. The sensitivity of the parameter papillary length hence was only 46%.
CONCLUSIONS: Although gastro-oesophageal reflux produces slight histological changes apart from oesophageal erosions in a few subjects, none of the established histological parameters can fulfil the for the diagnosis of GORD in patients without visible oesophageal erosions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8977332      PMCID: PMC1383289          DOI: 10.1136/gut.39.2.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

1.  Esophageal histology in gastroesophageal reflux. Morphometric findings in suction biopsies.

Authors:  U Seefeld; G J Krejs; R E Siebenmann; A L Blum
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1977-11

2.  Histological consequences of gastroesophageal reflux in man.

Authors:  F Ismail-Beigi; P F Horton; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.

Authors:  C Emde; A Garner; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Management of dyspepsia: report of a working party.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-03-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Histologic evaluation of chronic gastroesophageal reflux. An evaluation of biopsy methods and diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  T E Knuff; S B Benjamin; G F Worsham; J E Hancock; D O Castell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Technique, indications, and clinical use of 24 hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; C I Wang; J A Wernly; C A Pellegrini; A G Little; P Klementschitsch; G Bermudez; L F Johnson; D B Skinner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Is long-term esophageal pH monitoring of clinical value?

Authors:  A G Klauser; C Heinrich; N E Schindlbeck; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Optimal thresholds, sensitivity, and specificity of long-term pH-metry for the detection of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  N E Schindlbeck; C Heinrich; A König; A Dendorfer; F Pace; S A Müller-Lissner
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Microscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa in a consecutive series of patients submitted to upper endoscopy. Correlation with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and macroscopic findings.

Authors:  P Funch-Jensen; K Kock; L A Christensen; J Fallingborg; J J Kjaergaard; S P Andersen; P S Teglbjaerg
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Prevalence of metaplasia at the gastro-oesophageal junction.

Authors:  S J Spechler; J M Zeroogian; D A Antonioli; H H Wang; R K Goyal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  23 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  S Nandurkar; N J Talley; C J Martin; T Ng; S Adams
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain.

Authors:  R Fass; G Tougas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Biopsy assessment of drug efficacy in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Marjorie M Walker
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Acid challenge to the human esophageal mucosa: effects on epithelial architecture in health and disease.

Authors:  Mogens Bove; Michael Vieth; Frank Dombrowski; Lars Ny; Magnus Ruth; Lars Lundell
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Functional heartburn.

Authors:  Ram Dickman; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

Review 7.  Minimal changes in reflux esophagitis: red ones and white ones.

Authors:  Michio Hongo
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and reflux esophagitis are all distinct conditions--a debate: pro.

Authors:  Tomás Navarro-Rodriguez; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08

Review 9.  Current perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment of functional esophageal disorders.

Authors:  Roy Dekel; Ronnie Fass
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-08

10.  Microscopic esophagitis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease: individual lesions, biopsy sampling, and clinical correlations.

Authors:  Luca Mastracci; Paola Spaggiari; Federica Grillo; Patrizia Zentilin; Pietro Dulbecco; Paola Ceppa; Paola Baccini; Carlo Mansi; Vincenzo Savarino; Roberto Fiocca
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.