Literature DB >> 2929555

Is long-term esophageal pH monitoring of clinical value?

A G Klauser1, C Heinrich, N E Schindlbeck, S A Müller-Lissner.   

Abstract

Two hundred eighty-nine patients with various chest symptoms were studied by interview for the presence and type of symptoms, and by long-term esophageal pH monitoring for acid reflux. One hundred eighty of the patients also had upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. There was significant correlation between the results of all three methods. pH monitoring was more sensitive (92.9% vs. 81.0%) and specific (41.3% vs. 23.9%), and classified more patients correctly (55.6% vs. 37.2%), than an interview by an experienced gastroenterologist when esophageal erosions were regarded as "gold standard" for pathologic reflux. Of all patients, 31.5% had unclear symptoms and therefore could not be diagnosed by interview alone. Forty nine percent of these had pathologic reflux on pH monitoring. Among the patients, 72.3% who had symptoms typical of reflux disease also had a pathologic result at pH monitoring. It is concluded that most patients with unambiguous symptoms of esophageal reflux can correctly be diagnosed by interview, but that esophageal pH monitoring has a role in the management of patients with less characteristic chest symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2929555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  14 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Esophageal histology does not provide additional useful information over clinical assessment in identifying reflux patients presenting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  S Nandurkar; N J Talley; C J Martin; T Ng; S Adams
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Diagnosis of reflux disease.

Authors:  N I McDougall
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Medical conditions and erosive tooth wear.

Authors:  R Moazzez; R Austin
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  How well can quantitative 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring distinguish various degrees of reflux disease?

Authors:  G Ghillebert; A M Demeyere; J Janssens; G Vantrappen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Efficacy and one year follow up of argon plasma coagulation therapy for ablation of Barrett's oesophagus: factors determining persistence and recurrence of Barrett's epithelium.

Authors:  K K Basu; B Pick; R Bale; K P West; J S de Caestecker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R K Dhiman; V A Saraswat; A Mishra; S R Naik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Validation of a new method of measuring esophageal acid exposure: comparison with 24-hour pH monitoring.

Authors:  J Tack; G Vantrappen; G Huyberechts; D Sifrim; J Janssens; R Van Overstraeten
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Streamlining 24-hour pH study for GERD: Use of a 3-hour postprandial test.

Authors:  Amindra S Arora; Joseph A Murray
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  pH-metric analysis after successful antireflux surgery: comparison of 24-hour pH profiles in patients undergoing floppy fundoplication or Roux-en-Y duodenal diversion.

Authors:  J T Salminen; J A Salo; J A Tuominen; O J Rämö; M Färkkilä; S P Mattila
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.