Literature DB >> 8976892

Advance directives: from the perspective of the patient and the physician.

S C Johnston1, S C Johnson.   

Abstract

American physicians and patients share some common ground in their perspectives on advance directives. The majority in both groups strongly endorse the use of these documents. Both groups believe it is the physician's responsibility to initiate the discussion about advance directives. However, a gap between the two perspectives can be defined. In end-of-life decision making, physicians balance the ethical principle of patient autonomy with other principles such as appropriate withholding of care in the setting of futility. Patients' preferences for end-of-life care are most influenced by expected outcomes. Physicians tend to be selective in their indications for initiating a discussion about advance directives, according to clinical factors. In contrast, most patients want to discuss advance directives with their physician under all circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976892      PMCID: PMC1295958          DOI: 10.1177/014107689608901008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  30 in total

1.  Catalysts for conversations about advance directives: the influence of physician and patient characteristics.

Authors:  J Sugarman; N E Kass; R R Faden; S N Goodman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D J Murphy; D Burrows; S Santilli; A W Kemp; S Tenner; B Kreling; J Teno
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Limits of patient autonomy. Physician attitudes and practices regarding life-sustaining treatments and euthanasia.

Authors:  T R Fried; M D Stein; P S O'Sullivan; D W Brock; D H Novack
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-03-22

4.  Factors influencing physicians in recommending in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  D L Miller; M J Gorbien; L A Simbartl; D W Jahnigen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-13

5.  Empowerment of the older patient? A randomized, controlled trial to increase discussion and use of advance directives.

Authors:  G A Sachs; C B Stocking; S H Miles
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  The Patient Self-Determination Act and the future of advance directives.

Authors:  P J Greco; K A Schulman; R Lavizzo-Mourey; J Hansen-Flaschen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The do-not-resuscitate order: a comparison of physician and patient preferences and decision-making.

Authors:  M H Ebell; D J Doukas; M A Smith
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Physicians' attitudes towards living wills and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  L L Brunetti; S D Carperos; R E Westlund
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Advance directives. Stability of patients' treatment choices.

Authors:  L L Emanuel; E J Emanuel; J D Stoeckle; L R Hummel; M J Barry
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-01-24

10.  Stability of choices about life-sustaining treatments.

Authors:  M Danis; J Garrett; R Harris; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  2 in total

1.  Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.

Authors:  J Richter; M Eisemann; E Zgonnikova
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Changes in attitudes towards hastened death among Finnish physicians over the past sixteen years.

Authors:  Reetta P Piili; Riina Metsänoja; Heikki Hinkka; Pirkko-Liisa I Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Juho T Lehto
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.