Literature DB >> 8302322

The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

D J Murphy1, D Burrows, S Santilli, A W Kemp, S Tenner, B Kreling, J Teno.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that a majority of elderly patients would want to undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if they had a cardiac arrest. Yet few studies have examined their preferences after clinicians have informed them about the outcomes of CPR.
METHODS: To study older patients' preferences regarding CPR, we interviewed as many ambulatory patients as possible in one geriatrics practice in Denver from August 1, 1991, through July 31, 1992.
RESULTS: A total of 371 patients at least 60 years of age were eligible; 287 completed the interview (mean age, 77 years; range, 60 to 99). When asked about their wishes if they had cardiac arrest during an acute illness, 41 percent opted for CPR before learning the probability of survival to discharge. After learning the probability of survival (10 to 17 percent), 22 percent opted for CPR. Only 6 percent of patients 86 years of age or older opted for CPR under these conditions. When asked about a chronic illness in which the life expectancy was less than one year, 11 percent of the 287 patients opted for CPR before learning the probability of survival to discharge. After learning the probability of survival (0 to 5 percent), 5 percent said they would want CPR.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients readily understand prognostic information, which influences their preferences with respect to CPR. Most do not want to undergo CPR once a clinician explains the probability of survival after the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8302322     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199402243300807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  106 in total

1.  Care of dying patients: beyond symptom management.

Authors:  S Z Pantilat
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-10

2.  Do not resuscitate decisions. Rigid discussion process before making these decisions may cause distress.

Authors:  T Downes; J Liddle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

3.  Discrepancy between treatment goals documentation by oncologists and their understanding among cancer patients under active treatment with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Varun Monga; Seth M Maliske; Hassan Kaleem; Sarah L Mott; Gideon K D Zamba; Mohammed Milhem
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 4.  [Ethical conflicts in emergency medicine].

Authors:  M Mohr; D Kettler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  An analysis of CPR decision-making by elderly patients.

Authors:  G M Sayers; I Schofield; M Aziz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  End-of-life decision making: a qualitative study of elderly individuals.

Authors:  K E Rosenfeld; N S Wenger; M Kagawa-Singer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Comparison of APACHE III, APACHE IV, SAPS 3, and MPM0III and influence of resuscitation status on model performance.

Authors:  Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  What do I have to lose? Effects of a psycho-educational intervention on cancer patient preference for resuscitation.

Authors:  Sharon R Sears; Julia T Woodward; Robert K Twillman
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2007-08-22

9.  Intensive care unit admission in multiple sclerosis: increased incidence and increased mortality.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Charles N Bernstein; Christine A Peschken; Carol A Hitchon; Hui Chen; Randy Fransoo; Allan Garland
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?

Authors:  J A Tulsky; M A Chesney; B Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.