Literature DB >> 8976887

Does hospital-at-home make economic sense? Early discharge versus standard care for orthopaedic patients.

M Hensher1, N Fulop, S Hood, S Ujah.   

Abstract

Hospital-at-home has been promoted as a potentially effective means of replacing costly inpatient care with cheaper domiciliary care. We studied three hospital-at-home schemes in West London providing intensive home care for early discharge orthopaedic patients, comparing their costs with those of standard inpatient care. Although costs per day of hospital-at-home care were lower than those of inpatient care, the schemes appeared to increase the total duration of orthopaedic episodes, so that the costs of standard care, per episode, were lower than those of hospital-at-home. While hospital-at-home may offer considerable future potential, substitution of home care for inpatient care will not necessarily save resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8976887      PMCID: PMC1295953          DOI: 10.1177/014107689608901003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  1 in total

1.  Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture.

Authors:  W Hollingworth; C Todd; M Parker; J A Roberts; R Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-09
  1 in total
  16 in total

1.  The hospital of the future. Better out than in? Alternatives to acute hospital care.

Authors:  M Hensher; N Fulop; J Coast; E Jefferys
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-23

2.  Organisational change and quality of health care: an evolving international agenda.

Authors:  M McKee; L Aiken; A M Rafferty; J Sochalski
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-03

3.  Randomised controlled trial of effectiveness of Leicester hospital at home scheme compared with hospital care.

Authors:  A Wilson; H Parker; A Wynn; C Jagger; N Spiers; J Jones; G Parker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

4.  Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  J Coast; S H Richards; T J Peters; D J Gunnell; M A Darlow; J Pounsford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

5.  Hospital at home: from red to amber?. Data that will reassure advocates-but without satisfying the sceptics.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

6.  Does the National Health Service want hospital-at-home?

Authors:  N J Fulop; S Hood; S Parsons
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Hospital-at-home: buyer beware.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study.

Authors:  Catherine Deri Armstrong; William E Hogg; Jacques Lemelin; Simone Dahrouge; Carmel Martin; Gary S Viner; Raphael Saginur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

10.  Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge, hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care.

Authors:  S H Richards; J Coast; D J Gunnell; T J Peters; J Pounsford; M A Darlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.