Literature DB >> 8241853

Cost analysis of early discharge after hip fracture.

W Hollingworth1, C Todd, M Parker, J A Roberts, R Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the economic impact of an early discharge scheme for hip fracture patients.
DESIGN: Population based study comparing costs of care for patients who had "hospital at home" as an option for rehabilitation and those who had no early discharge service available in their area of residence.
SETTING: District hospital orthopaedic and rehabilitation wards and community hospital at home scheme. PATIENTS: 1104 consecutively admitted patients with fractured neck of femur. 24 patients from outside the district were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per patient episode and number of bed days spent in hospital.
RESULTS: Patients with the hospital at home option spent significantly less time as inpatients (mean of 32.5 v 41.7 days; p < 0.001). Those patients who were discharged early spent a mean of 11.5 days under hospital at home care. The total direct cost to the health service was significantly less for those patients with access to early discharge than those with no early discharge option (4884 pounds v 5606 pounds; p = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: About 40% of patients with fractured neck of femur are suitable for early discharge to a scheme such as hospital at home. The availability of such a scheme leads to lower direct costs of rehabilitative care despite higher readmission costs. These savings accrue largely from shorter stays in orthopaedic and geriatric wards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8241853      PMCID: PMC1679043          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6909.903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Cost-benefit analysis of hip fracture treatment.

Authors:  M J Parker; J W Myles; J K Anand; R Drewett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-03

2.  Rehabilitation after hip fractures. Home and hospital management compared.

Authors:  G A Pryor; D R Williams
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

3.  Proximal femoral fractures: some determinants of outcome.

Authors:  I F Greatorex; A C Gibbs
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Evaluation of a mental test score for assessment of mental impairment in the elderly.

Authors:  H M Hodkinson
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Clinician-directed hospital cost management for total hip arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  L S Sommers; D J Schurman; J Q Jamison; S T Woolson; B L Robison; J F Silverman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Peterborough Hospital at Home scheme.

Authors:  I G Mowat; R T Morgan
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-02-27

7.  Hip fractures in primary health care. Evaluation of a rehabilitation programme.

Authors:  L Borgquist; E Nordell; G B Jarnlo; B Strömqvist; H Wingstrand; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.581

8.  Analysing stages of care in hospital stay for fractured neck of femur.

Authors:  J A Robbins; L J Donaldson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-11-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Rising incidence of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  W J Boyce; M P Vessey
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Team management of the elderly patient with hip fracture.

Authors:  G A Pryor; J W Myles; D R Williams; J K Anand
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Why are we trying to reduce length of stay? Evaluation of the costs and benefits of reducing time in hospital must start from the objectives that govern change.

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

2.  Impact of organisational changes on fracture neck of femur management.

Authors:  Emad Mallick; Abhinav Gulihar; Grahame Taylor; Andrew Furlong; Radhakant Pandey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Jones; A Wilson; H Parker; A Wynn; C Jagger; N Spiers; G Parker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

4.  Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  J Coast; S H Richards; T J Peters; D J Gunnell; M A Darlow; J Pounsford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

5.  Hospital at home. Scheme in Peterborough is expanding.

Authors:  J W Myles; G A Pryor; M Parker; J K Anand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-27

6.  Hospital-at-home: buyer beware.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Hip fracture prevention: cost-effective strategies.

Authors:  P Vestergaard; L Rejnmark; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  GPs' role and recognition. GPs taken for granted ...

Authors:  J H Fitton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-30

9.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13

10.  Cost analysis of a system of ad hoc theatre sessions for the management of delayed trauma cases.

Authors:  Oreste Basso
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-01-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.