Literature DB >> 18208958

Home-based intermediate care program vs hospitalization: Cost comparison study.

Catherine Deri Armstrong1, William E Hogg, Jacques Lemelin, Simone Dahrouge, Carmel Martin, Gary S Viner, Raphael Saginur.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether a home-based intermediate care program in a large Canadian city lowers the cost of care and to look at whether such home-based programs could be a solution to the increasing demands on Canadian hospitals.
DESIGN: Single-arm study with historical controls.
SETTING: Department of Family Medicine at the Ottawa Hospital (Civic campus) in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Patients requiring hospitalization for acute care. Participants were matched with historical controls based on case-mix, most responsible diagnosis, and level of complexity.
INTERVENTIONS: Placement in the home-based intermediate care program. Daily home visits from the nurse practitioner and 24-hour access to care by telephone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Multivariate regression models were used to estimate the effect of the program on 5 outcomes: length of stay in hospital, cost of care substituted for hospitalization (Canadian dollars), readmission for a related diagnosis, readmission for any diagnosis, and costs incurred by community home-care services for patients following discharge from hospital.
RESULTS: The outcomes of 43 hospital admissions were matched with those of 363 controls. Patients enrolled in the program stayed longer in hospital (coefficient 3.3 days, P < .001), used more community care services following discharge (coefficient $729, P = .007), and were more likely to be readmitted to hospital within 3 months of discharge (coefficient 17%, P = .012) than patients treated in hospital. Total substituted costs of home-based care were not significantly different from the costs of hospitalization (coefficient -$501, P = .11).
CONCLUSION: While estimated cost savings were not statistically significant, the limitations of our study suggest that we underestimated these savings. In particular, the economic inefficiencies of a small immature program and the inability to control for certain factors when selecting historical controls affected our results. Further research is needed to determine the economic effect of mature home-based programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18208958      PMCID: PMC2293319     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  15 in total

1.  A randomised controlled trial of the costs of hospital as compared with hospital in the home for acute medical patients.

Authors:  N Board; N Brennan; G A Caplan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.939

2.  Health care and social welfare costs in home-based and hospital-based rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Agneta Andersson; Lars-Ake Levin; Birgitta Oberg; Linda Månsson
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2002-12

3.  Hospital in the home is cost saving for appropriately selected patients: a comparison with in-hospital care.

Authors:  C Raina MacIntyre; Denise Ruth; Zahid Ansari
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  Economic evaluation of hospital at home versus hospital care: cost minimisation analysis of data from randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J Jones; A Wilson; H Parker; A Wynn; C Jagger; N Spiers; G Parker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

5.  Cost comparison of hospital- and home-based treatment models for acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  C Nicholson; S Bowler; C Jackson; D Schollay; M Tweeddale; P O'Rourke
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Home or hospital? An evaluation of the costs, preferences, and outcomes of domiciliary chemotherapy.

Authors:  M T King; J Hall; S Caleo; H P Gurney; P R Harnett
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.663

7.  A cost-minimization analysis of oncology home care versus hospital care.

Authors:  R Subirana Serrate; O Ferrer-Roca; E González-Dávila
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.184

8.  Cost analysis of a hospital-at-home initiative using discrete event simulation.

Authors:  H Campbell; J Karnon; R Dowie
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-01

Review 9.  Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care.

Authors:  S Shepperd; S Iliffe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

10.  Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. II: cost minimisation analysis.

Authors:  S Shepperd; D Harwood; A Gray; M Vessey; P Morgan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-13
View more
  6 in total

1.  Integrating Physician Services in the Home: evaluation of an innovative program.

Authors:  Moira Stewart; John F Sangster; Bridget L Ryan; Jeffrey S Hoch; Irene Cohen; Carol L McWilliam; Joan Mitchell; Evelyn Vingilis; Christine Tyrrell; Ian R McWhinney
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Population-based home care services in breast cancer: utilization and costs.

Authors:  N Mittmann; P K Isogai; R Saskin; N Liu; J M Porter; M C Cheung; N B Leighl; J S Hoch; M E Trudeau; W K Evans; K N Dainty; C C Earle
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Utilization and costs of home care for patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Ning Liu; Joan Porter; Soo Jin Seung; Pierre K Isogai; Refik Saskin; Matthew C Cheung; Natasha B Leighl; Jeffrey S Hoch; Maureen Trudeau; William K Evans; Katie N Dainty; Craig C Earle
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-02-04

4.  Effectiveness of a transitional home care program in reducing acute hospital utilization: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Lian Leng Low; Farhad Fakhrudin Vasanwala; Lee Beng Ng; Cynthia Chen; Kheng Hock Lee; Shu Yun Tan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Effects of three home-based exercise programmes regarding falls, quality of life and exercise-adherence in older adults at risk of falling: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne-Gabrielle Mittaz Hager; Nicolas Mathieu; Constanze Lenoble-Hoskovec; Jaap Swanenburg; Rob de Bie; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 6.  The effectiveness of intermediate care including transitional care interventions on function, healthcare utilisation and costs: a scoping review.

Authors:  Duygu Sezgin; Rónán O'Caoimh; Aaron Liew; Mark R O'Donovan; Maddelena Illario; Mohamed A Salem; Siobhán Kennelly; Ana María Carriazo; Luz Lopez-Samaniego; Cristina Arnal Carda; Rafael Rodriguez-Acuña; Marco Inzitari; Teija Hammar; Anne Hendry
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 1.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.