Literature DB >> 8976540

Olfactory conditioning in the honey bee, Apis mellifera: effects of odor intensity.

S Bhagavan1, B H Smith.   

Abstract

Any odor-guided behavior might require generalization and/or discrimination over a wide range of odorant intensities. Proboscis extension conditioning (PEC) and electroantennogram (EAG) assays were used to investigate stimulus-intensity dynamics during olfactory processing in the honey bee. Experiments that tested generalization involved conditioning to one odorant concentration and either testing with a different odorant or with different concentrations of the same odorant. At low training concentrations, responses to either a novel odorant or to higher concentrations of the same odorant resulted in strong generalization. At higher training concentrations, significantly less generalization was observed to a novel odorant or to lower concentrations of the same odor. EAG analyses indicate that asymmetric generalization could arise due to long-term adaptation of peripheral receptor neurons. Discrimination experiments showed that relatively higher odorant concentrations associated with an appetitive reinforcer could usually be discriminated from a lower concentration that was associated with punishment, but not vice versa. Although sensory modulation in peripheral (sensory) processes might be sufficient to account for discrimination of a high from a low concentration, discrimination of low from high concentrations point to the involvement of central processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8976540     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00357-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  38 in total

1.  Variation in complex olfactory stimuli and its influence on odour recognition.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wrigh; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Evolving protein functional diversity in new genes of Drosophila.

Authors:  Jianming Zhang; Antony M Dean; Frédéric Brunet; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Associative learning of odor with food- or blood-meal by Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Jeffery K Tomberlin; Glen C Rains; Sandy A Allan; Michelle R Sanford; W Joe Lewis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-08-19

4.  Adaptive regulation of sparseness by feedforward inhibition.

Authors:  Collins Assisi; Mark Stopfer; Gilles Laurent; Maxim Bazhenov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Robust encoding of stimulus identity and concentration in the accessory olfactory system.

Authors:  Hannah A Arnson; Timothy E Holy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Intensity and the ratios of compounds in the scent of snapdragon flowers affect scent discrimination by honeybees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Amy Lutmerding; Natalia Dudareva; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  A honeybee's ability to learn, recognize, and discriminate odors depends upon odor sampling time and concentration.

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Michelle Carlton; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Encoding of mixtures in a simple olfactory system.

Authors:  Kai Shen; Sina Tootoonian; Gilles Laurent
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Distinct memories of odor intensity and quality in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pavel Masek; Martin Heisenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.