Literature DB >> 19826884

Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery.

Valerie Bridoux1, Grégoire Moutel, Benoit Lefebure, Michel Scotte, Francis Michot, Christian Herve, Jean-Jacques Tuech.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has become an important outcome measure in surgical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRQOL assessment methodology of randomised clinical trials concerning gastrointestinal surgery.
METHODS: All articles published in the calendar years 2006 and 2007 that purported to assess quality of life as end points or make some conclusion about quality of life were chosen for review from eight general surgical journals and four medical journals. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of predetermined criteria.
RESULTS: Twenty-four published randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs)s with an HRQOL component were identified. Although most trials exhibited good-quality research, some methodological limitations were identified: Only 21% of the studies gave a rationale for selecting a specific HRQOL measure, 46% of the studies failed to report information about the administration of the HRQOL measure, and 37% did not give details on missing data.
CONCLUSIONS: Although it is clear that HRQOL is an important end point in surgical RCTs because the information helps to influence treatment recommendations, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826884      PMCID: PMC3107825          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1052-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

Authors:  D Moher; A Jones; L Lepage
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Quality of life instruments in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; D Stark; P Selby
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 4.  Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  P Jüni; D G Altman; M Egger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-07

5.  A taxonomy of the uses of health-related quality-of-life instruments in cancer care and the clinical meaningfulness of the results.

Authors:  David Osoba
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a users' guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Carol M Moinpour; Timothy J Moynihan; Donald L Patrick; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 7.  Quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: what has been learnt?

Authors:  T Conroy; H Bleiberg; B Glimelius
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Quality of life in patients undergoing systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Bottomley; Patrick Therasse
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer--taking stock.

Authors:  Pamela J Goodwin; Jeanne T Black; Louise J Bordeleau; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Health related quality of life assessment methodology and reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of primary brain cancer patients.

Authors:  F Efficace; A Bottomley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  3 in total

1.  Methodological and ethical quality of randomized controlled clinical trials in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valérie Bridoux; Grégoire Moutel; Horace Roman; Babak Kianifard; Francis Michot; Christian Herve; Jean-Jacques Tuech
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Pascal Gervaz; Béatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Philippe Morel; Olivier Huber; Ihsan Inan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The false dichotomy of surgical futility in the emergency laparotomy setting: scoping review.

Authors:  Hannah Javanmard-Emamghissi; Sonia Lockwood; Sarah Hare; Jon N Lund; Gillian M Tierney; Susan J Moug
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.