Literature DB >> 20495708

Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis provides an objective measure of competency during training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP).

Hayley M Waller1, Saxon J Connor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a complex and technically challenging procedure with a risk of significant complications. Although recommendations exist as to how many ERCPs should be performed before a trainee is deemed competent they lack objective measures of outcome. Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis allows continuous monitoring of a proceduralist's performance to ensure acceptable outcomes are being achieved. The aim of the present study was to assess a trainee's progress with ERCP using Cusum analysis.
METHOD: A single trainee performed one supervised ERCP list per week between June 2005 and May 2008. Prospective data were collected and analysed by intention to treat using Cumulative failure charting and Cusum analysis. The binary outcome measure was successful cannulation in patients with a native sphincter. Acceptable and unacceptable cannulation failure rates were set at 20% and 35% respectively, with Type I and II error rates set at 0.10.
RESULTS: A total of 290 ERCPs were performed. Successful cannulation was achieved in 168 of 238 (70.6%) patients with intact biliary sphincters. Although cumulative failure charting suggested the trainee had not yet achieved satisfactory performance, Cusum analysis with sequential probability ratio testing indicated that an acceptable outcome had been achieved for the last 179 consecutive ERCPs.
CONCLUSION: Cusum analysis enables sensitive and continuous monitoring of a trainee's performance to objectively determine competency. Wider and systematic use may enable appropriate benchmarks to be identified and more objective assessment of a trainee's experience.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20495708      PMCID: PMC2785951          DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00091.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  9 in total

1.  Cumulative sum techniques for assessing surgical results.

Authors:  Gary L Grunkemeier; Ying Xing Wu; Anthony P Furnary
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Assessing doctors' competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors' performance.

Authors:  T O Lim; A Soraya; L M Ding; Z Morad
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  ERCP core curriculum.

Authors:  Robynne K Chutkan; Asyia S Ahmad; Jonathan Cohen; Marcia R Cruz-Correa; David J Desilets; Jason A Dominitz; Brian J Dunkin; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Lee McHenry; Girish Mishra; David Perdue; John L Petrini; Patrick R Pfau; Thomas J Savides; Jennifer J Telford; John J Vargo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review.

Authors:  Cheng-Hon Yap; Mark E Colson; David A Watters
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  A statistical approach to measuring the competence of anaesthetic trainees at practical procedures.

Authors:  I G Kestin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Quantitative assessment of procedural competence. A prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  P S Jowell; J Baillie; M S Branch; J Affronti; C L Browning; B P Bute
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice.

Authors:  Earl J Williams; Steve Taylor; Peter Fairclough; Adrian Hamlyn; Richard F Logan; Derrick Martin; Stuart A Riley; Peter Veitch; Mark Wilkinson; Paula R Williamson; Martin Lombard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery.

Authors:  David Spiegelhalter; Olivia Grigg; Robin Kinsman; Tom Treasure
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.038

9.  Training surgeons in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  G C Vitale; C M Zavaleta; D S Vitale; J C Binford; T C Tran; G M Larson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Measuring trainee competence in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Theodor Voiosu; Paul Bălănescu; Andrei Voiosu; Andreea Benguş; Carmen Preda; Devica S Umans; Radu Bogdan Mateescu; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.

Authors:  Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Di Qi; Karthikeyan Panneerselvam; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Andinet Enquobahrie; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early Splenic Flexure Intubation Competency Predicts Early Cecal Intubation Competency in Gastroenterology Fellows.

Authors:  Sean T McCarthy; Jennifer Jorgensen; Grace H Elta; Joseph C Kolars; Sheryl Korsnes; Valbona Metko; James Stout; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  What Would Be the Appropriate Number of Clinical ERCP Cases for Trainees to Acquire Basic Competence? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Wenkang Fu; Joseph Leung; Yudong Wang; Tang-Wei Chuang; Wei-Chih Liao; Wenbo Meng; Wence Zhou; Xun Li
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Can Trainees Safely Perform Endoscopic Treatments for Common Bile Duct Stones? A Single-center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Tomoya Iida; Hiroyuki Kaneto; Kohei Wagatsuma; Hajime Sasaki; Yumiko Naganawa; Suguru Nakagaki; Shuji Satoh; Haruo Shimizu; Hiroshi Nakase
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 1.271

6.  EUS-guided pancreatic drainage: A steep learning curve.

Authors:  Amy Tyberg; Vimal Bodiwala; Prashant Kedia; Paul R Tarnasky; Muhammad Ali Khan; Aleksey Novikov; Monica Gaidhane; Jose Celso Ardengh; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.628

7.  Statistical Process Control Charts for Monitoring Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Turnaround in Precision Medicine Initiatives.

Authors:  Sneha Rajiv Jain; Wilson Sim; Cheng Han Ng; Yip Han Chin; Wen Hui Lim; Nicholas L Syn; Nur Haidah Bte Ahmad Kamal; Mehek Gupta; Valerie Heong; Xiao Wen Lee; Nur Sabrina Sapari; Xue Qing Koh; Zul Fazreen Adam Isa; Lucius Ho; Caitlin O'Hara; Arvindh Ulagapan; Shi Yu Gu; Kashyap Shroff; Rei Chern Weng; Joey S Y Lim; Diana Lim; Brendan Pang; Lai Kuan Ng; Andrea Wong; Ross Andrew Soo; Wei Peng Yong; Cheng Ean Chee; Soo-Chin Lee; Boon-Cher Goh; Richie Soong; David S P Tan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Learning curves in ERCP during advanced endoscopy training: a Canadian multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Usman Khan; Rishad Khan; Eric Benchimol; Misbah Salim; Jennifer Telford; Robert Enns; Rachid Mohamed; Nauzer Forbes; Gurpal Sandha; Ali Kohansal; Jeffrey Mosko; Avijit Chatterjee; Gary May; Kevin Waschke; Alan Barkun; Paul D James
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-09-14

9.  Defining competency in flexible cystoscopy: a novel approach using cumulative Sum analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth R MacKenzie; Jonathan Aning
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.