BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a complex and technically challenging procedure with a risk of significant complications. Although recommendations exist as to how many ERCPs should be performed before a trainee is deemed competent they lack objective measures of outcome. Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis allows continuous monitoring of a proceduralist's performance to ensure acceptable outcomes are being achieved. The aim of the present study was to assess a trainee's progress with ERCP using Cusum analysis. METHOD: A single trainee performed one supervised ERCP list per week between June 2005 and May 2008. Prospective data were collected and analysed by intention to treat using Cumulative failure charting and Cusum analysis. The binary outcome measure was successful cannulation in patients with a native sphincter. Acceptable and unacceptable cannulation failure rates were set at 20% and 35% respectively, with Type I and II error rates set at 0.10. RESULTS: A total of 290 ERCPs were performed. Successful cannulation was achieved in 168 of 238 (70.6%) patients with intact biliary sphincters. Although cumulative failure charting suggested the trainee had not yet achieved satisfactory performance, Cusum analysis with sequential probability ratio testing indicated that an acceptable outcome had been achieved for the last 179 consecutive ERCPs. CONCLUSION: Cusum analysis enables sensitive and continuous monitoring of a trainee's performance to objectively determine competency. Wider and systematic use may enable appropriate benchmarks to be identified and more objective assessment of a trainee's experience.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) is a complex and technically challenging procedure with a risk of significant complications. Although recommendations exist as to how many ERCPs should be performed before a trainee is deemed competent they lack objective measures of outcome. Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis allows continuous monitoring of a proceduralist's performance to ensure acceptable outcomes are being achieved. The aim of the present study was to assess a trainee's progress with ERCP using Cusum analysis. METHOD: A single trainee performed one supervised ERCP list per week between June 2005 and May 2008. Prospective data were collected and analysed by intention to treat using Cumulative failure charting and Cusum analysis. The binary outcome measure was successful cannulation in patients with a native sphincter. Acceptable and unacceptable cannulation failure rates were set at 20% and 35% respectively, with Type I and II error rates set at 0.10. RESULTS: A total of 290 ERCPs were performed. Successful cannulation was achieved in 168 of 238 (70.6%) patients with intact biliary sphincters. Although cumulative failure charting suggested the trainee had not yet achieved satisfactory performance, Cusum analysis with sequential probability ratio testing indicated that an acceptable outcome had been achieved for the last 179 consecutive ERCPs. CONCLUSION: Cusum analysis enables sensitive and continuous monitoring of a trainee's performance to objectively determine competency. Wider and systematic use may enable appropriate benchmarks to be identified and more objective assessment of a trainee's experience.
Authors: Robynne K Chutkan; Asyia S Ahmad; Jonathan Cohen; Marcia R Cruz-Correa; David J Desilets; Jason A Dominitz; Brian J Dunkin; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Lee McHenry; Girish Mishra; David Perdue; John L Petrini; Patrick R Pfau; Thomas J Savides; Jennifer J Telford; John J Vargo Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Earl J Williams; Steve Taylor; Peter Fairclough; Adrian Hamlyn; Richard F Logan; Derrick Martin; Stuart A Riley; Peter Veitch; Mark Wilkinson; Paula R Williamson; Martin Lombard Journal: Gut Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Theodor Voiosu; Paul Bălănescu; Andrei Voiosu; Andreea Benguş; Carmen Preda; Devica S Umans; Radu Bogdan Mateescu; Jeanin E van Hooft Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Sean T McCarthy; Jennifer Jorgensen; Grace H Elta; Joseph C Kolars; Sheryl Korsnes; Valbona Metko; James Stout; Joel H Rubenstein Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Sneha Rajiv Jain; Wilson Sim; Cheng Han Ng; Yip Han Chin; Wen Hui Lim; Nicholas L Syn; Nur Haidah Bte Ahmad Kamal; Mehek Gupta; Valerie Heong; Xiao Wen Lee; Nur Sabrina Sapari; Xue Qing Koh; Zul Fazreen Adam Isa; Lucius Ho; Caitlin O'Hara; Arvindh Ulagapan; Shi Yu Gu; Kashyap Shroff; Rei Chern Weng; Joey S Y Lim; Diana Lim; Brendan Pang; Lai Kuan Ng; Andrea Wong; Ross Andrew Soo; Wei Peng Yong; Cheng Ean Chee; Soo-Chin Lee; Boon-Cher Goh; Richie Soong; David S P Tan Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Usman Khan; Rishad Khan; Eric Benchimol; Misbah Salim; Jennifer Telford; Robert Enns; Rachid Mohamed; Nauzer Forbes; Gurpal Sandha; Ali Kohansal; Jeffrey Mosko; Avijit Chatterjee; Gary May; Kevin Waschke; Alan Barkun; Paul D James Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2022-09-14