Literature DB >> 8956574

Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography.

F Regan1, J Fradin, R Khazan, M Bohlman, T Magnuson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to evaluate the usefulness of a new T2-weighted MR sequence using a half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) technique in the diagnosis of bile duct stones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 23 patients with suspected bile duct calculi using HASTE MR cholangiography and compared that imaging technique with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sonography. The study group consisted of 15 women and eight men who were 42-89 years old. Patients were imaged in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes with a 1.5-T MR scanner using a body coil. Acquisitions of 13 sec each allowed images to be obtained in a single breath-hold. All images were interpreted by two radiologists in a double-blinded fashion. The presence, number, and size of stones were noted, and common bile duct dilatation was assessed.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 23 patients were proven to have common bile duct stones. Stone size ranged from 3 mm to 35 mm (mean, 11 mm). HASTE MR cholangiography revealed stones in 14 (93%) of 15 patients; sonography revealed stones in nine (60%) of 15 patients. In 12 patients, the common bile duct was dilated, as shown by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, HASTE MR cholangiography, and sonography. On HASTE MR cholangiograms, we measured the diameter of the bile duct in all patients. The mean diameter was 11 mm, which correlated well (r = .82) with a mean diameter of 13.5 mm as measured on endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms.
CONCLUSION: HASTE MR cholangiography can noninvasively and rapidly reveal the presence of stones in the common bile duct and allows readers to assess the degree of biliary dilatation. The sequence should be considered as an alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with clinical evidence of bile duct calculi and in those for whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is impossible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8956574     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive imaging of the biliary ducts.

Authors:  J T Ferrucci
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Biliary tract imaging.

Authors:  E Corazziari
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

3.  Improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the routine use of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Authors:  C Ausch; G Hochwarter; M Taher; B Holzer; H R Rosen; M Urban; C Sebesta; W Hruby; R Schiessel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ankur Mandelia; Arun Kumar Gupta; Devendra Kumar Verma; Sanjeev Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

5.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Imaging of biliary disorders in children.

Authors:  Céline Rozel; Laurent Garel; Françoise Rypens; Loïc Viremouneix; Chantale Lapierre; Jean Claude Décarie; Josée Dubois
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-09-24

Review 7.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

8.  Is ERCP really necessary in case of suspected spontaneous passage of bile duct stones?

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takeshi Ishihara; Seigo Yukisawa; Tadashi Ohara; Masaru Tsuboi; Yoshihiko Ooka; Kazuki Kato; Kiyotake Katsuura; Michio Kimura; Makoto Takahashi; Kazuhisa Nemoto; Masaru Miyazaki; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a useful tool in the evaluation of pancreatic and biliary disorders.

Authors:  Ahmet-Mesrur Halefoglu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.