Literature DB >> 10980938

Biliary tract imaging.

E Corazziari1.   

Abstract

In addition to the detection of gallstones, common bile duct stones, and narrowed and dilated bile ducts, recent advancements in imaging techniques now make it possible to diagnose microlithiasis, pathology of normal-size ducts, and dysfunction of the gallbladder and the sphincter of Oddi (SO). More and more frequently, noninvasive imaging techniques obviate the risk of invasive investigation. These techniques can also take the place of unsuccessful or contraindicated direct cholangiography, and they play an essential role in treatment planning and diagnosis of postoperative complications. Transabdominal ultrasonography (TUS) remains fundamental for initial assessment of the biliary tract. Technical developments make magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the most promising diagnostic technique of the biliary tract. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is most helpful for detection of microlithiasis and evaluation of the ampullary region, the periductal structures, and the regional lymph nodes in neoplastic diseases. Cholescintigraphy is most valuable to assess bile dynamics in the diagnosis of gallbladder and SO dysfunction and in postoperative bile leakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10980938     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-996-0010-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  64 in total

1.  Diagnostic strategies for extrahepatic cholestasis of indefinite origin: endoscopic ultrasonography or retrograde cholangiography? Results of a prospective study.

Authors:  P Burtin; L Palazzo; J M Canard; B Person; F Oberti; J Boyer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Authors:  R E Hintze; A Adler; W Veltzke; H Abou-Rebyeh; R Hammerstingl; T Vogl; R Felix
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Neoplastic pancreaticobiliary duct obstruction: evaluation with breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  L H Schwartz; F V Coakley; Y Sun; L H Blumgart; Y Fong; D M Panicek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: value of MR cholangiography.

Authors:  L Guibaud; P M Bret; C Reinhold; M Atri; A N Barkun
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Complications of cholecystectomy. Incidence, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis.

Authors:  D J Deziel
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Optimal MR cholangiopancreatographic sequence and its clinical application.

Authors:  H Irie; H Honda; T Tajima; T Kuroiwa; K Yoshimitsu; K Makisumi; K Masuda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Half-Fourier RARE MR cholangiopancreatography: experience in 300 subjects.

Authors:  A S Fulcher; M A Turner; G W Capps; A M Zfass; K M Baker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography.

Authors:  F C Laing; R B Jeffrey; V W Wing
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  J A Soto; M A Barish; E K Yucel; D Siegenberg; J T Ferrucci; R Chuttani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of gastrointestinal pathology and treatment in children with suspected biliary dyskinesia.

Authors:  Wikrom Karnsakul; Richard Vaughan; Tarun Kumar; Stacey Gillespie; Kathryn Skitarelic
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  The diagnosis and management of Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas C Hall; Ashley R Dennison; Giuseppe Garcea
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.445

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.