Literature DB >> 8950661

An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks.

T S Buchanan1, D A Shreeve.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the modeling potential of proposed optimization cost functions for predicting muscle forces during isometric loading. Models of the muscles about the elbow (eleven muscles) and wrist (five muscles) were constructed. The models accounted for muscle moment arms, physiological cross-sectional area, specific tension, and percent fiber type. Five nonlinear optimization cost functions, a representative sample of those proposed to date, were analyzed: minimizing the sums of muscle force2, stress2, stress3, (normalized force)2, and minimizing fatigue. Several different protocols were implemented, including elbow models which balanced combinations of flexion-extension, supination-pronation, and varus-valgus loads. Theoretical predictions were compared with EMG data of muscle activation changes as a function of load direction and muscle coactivation relationships. Results indicate a strong dependence of muscle coordination predictions on the number of degrees of freedom balanced. The choice of cost function had little influence on the results. The cost functions examined were not able to reliably estimate muscle activation as a function of load direction. Furthermore, specific synergic relationships between muscle pairs could not be accurately represented. An error analysis indicated that the discrepancies between predicted values and actual values could not be explained by errors in physiological measurements, as the differences between these two were relatively insensitive to changes in the anatomical parameters. In short, no particular cost function was found to adequately represent actual muscle activity at the elbow, although predictions at the wrist were more favorable due to differences in the degrees of freedom at the joints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8950661     DOI: 10.1115/1.2796044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  19 in total

1.  Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments and movements from measurements of neural command.

Authors:  Thomas S Buchanan; David G Lloyd; Kurt Manal; Thor F Besier
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Evaluation of a particle swarm algorithm for biomechanical optimization.

Authors:  Jaco F Schutte; Byung-Il Koh; Jeffrey A Reinbolt; Raphael T Haftka; Alan D George; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Reproducibility and variability of the cost functions reconstructed from experimental recordings in multifinger prehension.

Authors:  Xun Niu; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  A computational model for optimal muscle activity considering muscle viscoelasticity in wrist movements.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kambara; Duk Shin; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Foot force direction in an isometric pushing task: prediction by kinematic and musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  M W Schmidt; C López-Ortiz; P S Barrett; L M Rogers; K G Gruben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Analytical and numerical analysis of inverse optimization problems: conditions of uniqueness and computational methods.

Authors:  Alexander V Terekhov; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Biofeedback for Gait Retraining Based on Real-Time Estimation of Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; David J Saxby; Elena Ceseracciu; Luca Modenese; David G Lloyd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Defining feasible bounds on muscle activation in a redundant biomechanical task: practical implications of redundancy.

Authors:  M Hongchul Sohn; J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation.

Authors:  Jason J Kutch; Arthur D Kuo; Anthony M Bloch; William Z Rymer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Feasible muscle activation ranges based on inverse dynamics analyses of human walking.

Authors:  Cole S Simpson; M Hongchul Sohn; Jessica L Allen; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.