Literature DB >> 23324321

A computational model for optimal muscle activity considering muscle viscoelasticity in wrist movements.

Hiroyuki Kambara1, Duk Shin, Yasuharu Koike.   

Abstract

To understand the mechanism of neural motor control, it is important to clarify how the central nervous system organizes the coordination of redundant muscles. Previous studies suggested that muscle activity for step-tracking wrist movements are optimized so as to reduce total effort or end-point variance under neural noise. However, since the muscle dynamics were assumed as a simple linear system, some characteristic patterns of experimental EMG were not seen in the simulated muscle activity of the previous studies. The biological muscle is known to have dynamic properties in which its elasticity and viscosity depend on activation level. The motor control system is supposed to consider the viscoelasticity of the muscles when generating motor command signals. In this study, we present a computational motor control model that can control a musculoskeletal system with nonlinear dynamics. We applied the model to step-tracking wrist movements actuated by five muscles with dynamic viscoelastic properties. To solve the motor redundancy, we designed the control model to generate motor commands that maximize end-point accuracy under signal-dependent noise, while minimizing the squared sum of them. Here, we demonstrate that the muscle activity simulated by our model exhibits spatiotemporal features of experimentally observed muscle activity of human and nonhuman primates. In addition, we show that the movement trajectories resulting from the simulated muscle activity resemble experimentally observed trajectories. These results suggest that, by utilizing inherent viscoelastic properties of the muscles, the neural system may optimize muscle activity to improve motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23324321      PMCID: PMC3628039          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00542.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  What are the computations of the cerebellum, the basal ganglia and the cerebral cortex?

Authors:  K Doya
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1999-10

4.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The curvature and variability of wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Steven K Charles; Neville Hogan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Dynamics of wrist rotations.

Authors:  Steven K Charles; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Control of fast-reaching movements by muscle synergy combinations.

Authors:  Andrea d'Avella; Alessandro Portone; Laure Fernandez; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Estimation of dynamic joint torques and trajectory formation from surface electromyography signals using a neural network model.

Authors:  Y Koike; M Kawato
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Optimal trajectory formation of constrained human arm reaching movements.

Authors:  Ken Ohta; Mikhail M Svinin; ZhiWei Luo; Shigeyuki Hosoe; Rafael Laboissière
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of age-related decline in control of preprogramed movement.

Authors:  Naoshi Shimoda; Jongho Lee; Mitsuhiko Kodama; Shinji Kakei; Yoshihisa Masakado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Analysis of Control Characteristics between Dominant and Non-Dominant Hands by Transient Responses of Circular Tracking Movements in 3D Virtual Reality Space.

Authors:  Wookhyun Park; Woong Choi; Hanjin Jo; Geonhui Lee; Jaehyo Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Morphological Computation Increases From Lower- to Higher-Level of Biological Motor Control Hierarchy.

Authors:  Daniel F B Haeufle; Katrin Stollenmaier; Isabelle Heinrich; Syn Schmitt; Keyan Ghazi-Zahedi
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-10-21

4.  Muscles Reduce Neuronal Information Load: Quantification of Control Effort in Biological vs. Robotic Pointing and Walking.

Authors:  Daniel F B Haeufle; Isabell Wochner; David Holzmüller; Danny Driess; Michael Günther; Syn Schmitt
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-06-24

5.  Muscle Synergy and Musculoskeletal Model-Based Continuous Multi-Dimensional Estimation of Wrist and Hand Motions.

Authors:  Yeongdae Kim; Sorawit Stapornchaisit; Hiroyuki Kambara; Natsue Yoshimura; Yasuharu Koike
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Analysis of Visuo Motor Control between Dominant Hand and Non-Dominant Hand for Effective Human-Robot Collaboration.

Authors:  Hanjin Jo; Woong Choi; Geonhui Lee; Wookhyun Park; Jaehyo Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.