Literature DB >> 12682808

Foot force direction in an isometric pushing task: prediction by kinematic and musculoskeletal models.

M W Schmidt1, C López-Ortiz, P S Barrett, L M Rogers, K G Gruben.   

Abstract

The abilities of a kinematic model and a muscle model of the human lower limb to predict the stereotyped direction of the muscular component of foot force produced by seated subjects in a static task were tested and compared. Human subjects ( n=11) performed a quasi-static, lower-limb pushing task against an instrumented bicycle pedal, free to rotate about its own axis, but with the crank fixed. Each pushing trial consisted of applying a force from the resting level to a force magnitude target with the right foot. Ten force target magnitudes were used (200, 250, ..., 650 N) along with 12 pedal positions. For each pushing effort, the muscular contribution to the measured foot force was determined from push onset to peak attained force. This segment was well characterized by a straight line across subjects, pedal positions, and force target magnitudes. The linear nature of the muscular component allowed a characteristic direction to be determined for each trial. A three-joint (hip, knee, and ankle) and a two-joint (hip and knee) net joint torque optimization was applied to a sagittal-plane kinematic model to predict the characteristic force direction. A musculoskeletal model was also used to create a feasible force space (FFS) for the lower limb. This FFS represents the range of possible forces the lower limb could theoretically produce. From this FFS, the direction of the maximum feasible foot force was determined and compared with the characteristic direction of subject performance. The muscle model proved to be the most effective in predicting subject force direction, followed by the three-joint and two-joint net joint torques optimizations. Similarities between the predictions of the kinematic and muscle model were also found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12682808     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1462-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions.

Authors:  B M van Bolhuis; C C Gielen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking: part II: lessons from dynamical simulations and clinical implications.

Authors:  Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Three-dimensional drawings in isometric conditions: relation between geometry and kinematics.

Authors:  J T Massey; J T Lurito; G Pellizzer; A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  In vivo moment arm calculations at the ankle using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  S G Rugg; R J Gregor; B R Mandelbaum; L Chiu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Prediction of pedal forces in bicycling using optimization methods.

Authors:  R Redfield; M L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area.

Authors:  R A Brand; D R Pedersen; J A Friederich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A theoretical basis for interpreting the force applied to the pedal in cycling.

Authors:  S A Kautz; M L Hull
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Biomechanical measures of muscular effort.

Authors:  J G Andrews
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  The independent effects of gravity and inertia on running mechanics.

Authors:  Y H Chang; H W Huang; C M Hamerski; R Kram
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Functional muscle synergies constrain force production during postural tasks.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Optimization of muscle activity for task-level goals predicts complex changes in limb forces across biomechanical contexts.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.