Literature DB >> 8950358

Discordance of assay methods creates pitfalls for the interpretation of prostate-specific antigen values.

A Semjonow1, B Brandt, F Oberpenning, S Roth, L Hertle.   

Abstract

The availability of numerous different assays for the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has created substantial problems in the interpretation of PSA concentrations. Currently over 60 assays are commercially offered on the European market. The majority of the recently marketed assays are based on the commonly used reference range (< 4 ng/ml), although this rarely has been verified. Some manufacturers avoid specifying the range altogether, while others derive the data from very small collectives. Reference ranges established with sera of young males or even with an unspecified proportion of sera of females are not suitable for assessing the specificity of PSA assays for detecting prostate cancer among males older than age 50 years. Most manufacturers recommend that their assays not be used for diagnostic purposes but only for following up patients previously diagnosed with prostate cancer. Usually the physician remains unaware of this warning as well as of the name of the assay used. Since PSA concentrations may vary in identical samples by a factor of two depending on the assay used, the clinician in charge of interpreting the results needs to be aware of the method used and must have detailed information on the assay-specific reference range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8950358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Suppl        ISSN: 1050-5881


  17 in total

1.  Twenty Years of PSA: From Prostate Antigen to Tumor Marker.

Authors:  Gabriela De Angelis; Harry G Rittenhouse; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; L Blair Shamel; Axel Semjonow
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

2.  Clinical quantitation of prostate-specific antigen biomarker in the low nanogram/milliliter range by conventional bore liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (multiple reaction monitoring) coupling and correlation with ELISA tests.

Authors:  Tanguy Fortin; Arnaud Salvador; Jean Philippe Charrier; Cristof Lenz; Xavier Lacoux; Aymeric Morla; Geneviève Choquet-Kastylevsky; Jérôme Lemoine
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Variability of assay methods for total and free PSA after WHO standardization.

Authors:  L Foj; X Filella; J Alcover; J M Augé; J M Escudero; R Molina
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-04

4.  Antibody-free, targeted mass-spectrometric approach for quantification of proteins at low picogram per milliliter levels in human plasma/serum.

Authors:  Tujin Shi; Thomas L Fillmore; Xuefei Sun; Rui Zhao; Athena A Schepmoes; Mahmud Hossain; Fang Xie; Si Wu; Jong-Seo Kim; Nathan Jones; Ronald J Moore; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić; Jacob Kagan; Karin D Rodland; Tao Liu; Keqi Tang; David G Camp; Richard D Smith; Wei-Jun Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Tumor markers in prostate cancer I: blood-based markers.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Axel Semjonow; Hans Lilja; Caroline Savage; Andrew J Vickers; Anders Bjartell
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Hyaluronic acid and hyaluronidase as possible novel urine biomarkers for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ioannis Skarmoutsos; Athanasios Skarmoutsos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Elisavet Tataki; Athina Giagini; Ioannis Adamakis; Christos Alamanis; Mordechai Duvdevani; Nikolaos Sitaras; Constantinos Constantinides
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the need to standardize.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Juan Alcover; Rafael Molina
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-28

8.  Assay-specific artificial neural networks for five different PSA assays and populations with PSA 2-10 ng/ml in 4,480 men.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Chuanliang Xu; Henning Cammann; Markus Graefen; Alexander Haese; Hartwig Huland; Axel Semjonow; Eleftherios P Diamandis; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Mark F Wildhagen; Bert G Blijenberg; Patrik Finne; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Klaus Jung; Hellmuth-Alexander Meyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Toward a prostate specific antigen-based prostate cancer diagnostic assay: preparation of keyhole limpet hemocyanin-conjugated normal and transformed prostate specific antigen fragments.

Authors:  Vadim Y Dudkin; Justin S Miller; Anna S Dudkina; Christophe Antczak; David A Scheinberg; Samuel J Danishefsky
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  [An artificial neural network as a tool in risk evaluation of prostate cancer. Indication for biopsy with the PSA range of 2-20 microg/l].

Authors:  C Stephan; B Vogel; H Cammann; M Lein; V Klevecka; P Sinha; G Kristiansen; D Schnorr; K Jung; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.