Literature DB >> 24092573

Variability of assay methods for total and free PSA after WHO standardization.

L Foj1, X Filella, J Alcover, J M Augé, J M Escudero, R Molina.   

Abstract

The variability of total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) results among commercial assays has been suggested to be decreased by calibration to World Health Organization (WHO) reference materials. To characterize the current situation, it is necessary to know its impact in the critical cutoffs used in clinical practice. In the present study, we tested 167 samples with tPSA concentrations of 0 to 20 μg/L using seven PSA and six fPSA commercial assays, including Access, ARCHITECT i2000, ADVIA Centaur XP, IMMULITE 2000, Elecsys, and Lumipulse G1200, in which we only measured tPSA. tPSA and fPSA were measured in Access using the Hybritech and WHO calibrators. Passing-Bablok analysis was performed for PSA, and percentage of fPSA with the Hybritech-calibrated access comparison assay. For tPSA, relative differences were more than 10 % at 0.2 μg/L for ARCHITECT i2000, and at a critical concentration of 3, 4, and 10 μg/L, the relative difference was exceeded by ADVIA Centaur XP and WHO-calibrated Access. For percent fPSA, at a critical concentration of 10 %, the 10 % relative difference limit was exceeded by IMMULITE 2000 assay. At a critical concentration of 20 and 25 %, ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT i2000, and IMMULITE 2000 assays exceeded the 10 % relative difference limit. We have shown significant discordances between assays included in this study despite advances in standardization conducted in the last years. Further harmonization efforts are required in order to obtain a complete clinical concordance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24092573     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-013-1249-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  19 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: WHO standardization of PSA tests: clinical consequences.

Authors:  Carsten Stephan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Standardization of assay methods reduces variability of total PSA measurements: an Irish study.

Authors:  James C Forde; Laure Marignol; Ophelia Blake; Ted McDermott; Ronald Grainger; Vivien E Crowley; Thomas H Lynch
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  A meta-analysis of the performance characteristics of the free prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  Richard Lee; A Russell Localio; Katrina Armstrong; S Bruce Malkowicz; J Sanford Schwartz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Michael J Duffy; Freddie C Hamdy; Anthony Milford Ward; Julietta Patnick; Christopher P Price; Janet Rimmer; Cathie Sturgeon; Peter White; Naomi E Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 6.  Discordance of assay methods creates pitfalls for the interpretation of prostate-specific antigen values.

Authors:  A Semjonow; B Brandt; F Oberpenning; S Roth; L Hertle
Journal:  Prostate Suppl       Date:  1996

7.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Discordant total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays: does calibration with WHO reference materials diminish the problem?

Authors:  Carsten Stephan; Thomas Köpke; Axel Semjonow; Michael Lein; Serdar Deger; Mark Schrader; Kurt Miller; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 9.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate cancer: prediction, detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Hans Lilja; David Ulmert; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Assessing the clinical impact of prostate-specific antigen assay variability and nonequimolarity: a simulation study based on the population of the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Andrew W Roddam; Christopher P Price; Naomi E Allen; Anthony Milford Ward
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 8.327

View more
  2 in total

1.  Percent free prostate-specific antigen is effective to predict prostate biopsy outcome in Chinese men with prostate-specific antigen between 10.1 and 20.0 ng ml(-1).

Authors:  Rui Chen; Li-Qun Zhou; Xiao-Bing Cai; Li-Ping Xie; Yi-Ran Huang; Da-Lin He; Xu Gao; Chuan-Liang Xu; Qiang Ding; Qiang Wei; Chang-Jun Yin; Shan-Cheng Ren; Fu-Bo Wang; Ye Tian; Zhong-Quan Sun; Qiang Fu; Lu-Lin Ma; Jun-Hua Zheng; Zhang-Qun Ye; Ding-Wei Ye; Dan-Feng Xu; Jian-Quan Hou; Ke-Xin Xu; Jian-Lin Yuan; Xin Gao; Chun-Xiao Liu; Tie-Jun Pan; Ying-Hao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Development and validation of a novel multivariate risk score to guide biopsy decision for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Helmut Klocker; Bruno Golding; Stephan Weber; Eberhard Steiner; Pierre Tennstedt; Thomas Keller; Ralph Schiess; Silke Gillessen; Wolfgang Horninger; Thomas Steuber
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-03-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.