Literature DB >> 21625940

Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the need to standardize.

Xavier Filella1, Juan Alcover, Rafael Molina.   

Abstract

Active surveillance has been proposed as an option for patients with low-risk prostate cancer in order to reduce the effects caused by overdiagnosis. Delaying treatment and applying it only if there is evidence of progression requires a careful identification of these patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels lower than 10 μg/L and Gleason score lower than 7 are the main criteria used to select patients for active surveillance based on experience accumulated in the last two decades. In the selection of patients with active surveillance two points are taken into consideration: (a) Gleason score changes introduced by the Consensus Conference of 2005; (b) differences between assays in the measurement of PSA serum levels, in the selection of patients for active surveillance. Improving the accuracy of patient's selection for active surveillance requires that Gleason score reassignment must be taken into account, as well as the harmonization between PSA assays. The use of incorrect results leads to misclassification of patients, undermining the goals of active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21625940     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-011-0193-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  30 in total

Review 1.  Quality requirements and control: EGTM recommendations. European Group on Tumour Markers.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

2.  Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-11-27

3.  Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study.

Authors:  Roderick C N van den Bergh; Stijn Roemeling; Monique J Roobol; Wouter Roobol; Fritz H Schröder; Chris H Bangma
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon.

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen; James A Hanley; George H Barrows; David F Penson; Pam D H Kowalczyk; M Melinda Sanders; Judith Fine
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3+4 versus Gleason score 4+3 tumor at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T Y Chan; A W Partin; P C Walsh; J I Epstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Discordance of assay methods creates pitfalls for the interpretation of prostate-specific antigen values.

Authors:  A Semjonow; B Brandt; F Oberpenning; S Roth; L Hertle
Journal:  Prostate Suppl       Date:  1996

9.  Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 + 3 and Gleason 3 + 4 tumors in a population based cohort.

Authors:  Jonathan L Wright; Claudia A Salinas; Daniel W Lin; Suzanne Kolb; Joseph Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jan-Erik Johansson; Ove Andrén; Swen-Olof Andersson; Paul W Dickman; Lars Holmberg; Anders Magnuson; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Promoter methylation and polymorphism of E-cadherin gene may confer a risk to prostate cancer: a meta-analysis based on 22 studies.

Authors:  Zheng Chang; Hongbing Zhou; Yi Liu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-24

2.  Clinical significance of NUCB2 mRNA expression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hongtuan Zhang; Can Qi; Liang Li; Fei Luo; Yong Xu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-16

3.  Expression of KIF18A Is Associated with Increased Tumor Stage and Cell Proliferation in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Tianyu Shen; Zheng Zhang; Yang Li; Zhongjie Pan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.