Literature DB >> 8946307

The Swedish randomised mammography screening trials: analysis of their effect on the breast cancer related excess mortality.

L G Larsson1, L Nyström, S Wall, L Rutqvist, I Andersson, N Bjurstam, G Fagerberg, J Frisell, L Tabár.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To apply an indirect method for estimation of the breast cancer related excess mortality in the Swedish randomised mammography screening trials.
SETTING: Randomised trials on mammography screening have, in Sweden, been performed in the counties of Kopparberg (W) and Ostergötland (E), the so called WE study, and in the three largest cities in Sweden, Stockholm (southern part), Gothenburg, and Malmö. An overview of the trials was presented in the Lancet in 1993 and included 156,911 women in the invited group and 125,866 in the control group.
METHODS: The excess mortality in the breast cancer subgroups was estimated by indirect standardisation using official national cause of death statistics according to Statistics Sweden as a reference.
RESULTS: The estimated reduction of the breast cancer related mortality was 24% for the whole group (40-74 years at randomisation). The corresponding figures for the age groups 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 years were 6%, 28%, and 34% respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results are very similar to those presented earlier based on the traditional comparison of the breast cancer mortality in the invited and in the control group. This analysis further strengthens previous reports on a beneficial effect of mammography screening, which is especially pronounced in the age group 50-69.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8946307     DOI: 10.1177/096914139600300305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  15 in total

1.  Systematic review of the breast cancer screening trials is error-ridden.

Authors:  László Tabar; Nicholas Day; Robert Smith; Tony H H Chen; Amy M F Yen; Stephen Duffy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The Swedish randomised controlled trial on mammography screening has been properly designed, conducted and analysed.

Authors:  Lennarth Nyström
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Classification of breast computed tomography data.

Authors:  Thomas R Nelson; Laura I Cerviño; John M Boone; Karen K Lindfors
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Objective assessment of task performance: a comparison of two FFDM detectors using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Andrey Makeev; Lynda C Ikejimba; Jesse Salad; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-10-17

7.  Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening.

Authors:  S E Stockdale; E Keeler; N Duan; K P Derose; S A Fox
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

9.  Is breast cancer prognosis inherited?

Authors:  Mikael Hartman; Linda Lindström; Paul W Dickman; Hans-Olov Adami; Per Hall; Kamila Czene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Is genetic background important in lung cancer survival?

Authors:  Linda S Lindström; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Fredrik Wiklund; Kamila Czene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.