Literature DB >> 894602

Rod-cone interaction in light adaptation.

M Latch, P Lennie.   

Abstract

1. The increment-threshold for a small test spot in the peripheral visual field was measured against backgrounds that were red or blue.2. When the background was a large uniform field, threshold over most of the scotopic range depended exactly upon the background's effect upon rods. This confirms Flamant & Stiles (1948). But when the background was small, threshold was elevated more by a long wave-length than a short wave-length background equated for its effect on rods.3. The influence of cones was explored in a further experiment. The scotopic increment-threshold was established for a short wave-length test spot on a large, short wave-length background. Then a steady red circular patch, conspicuous to cones, but below the increment-threshold for rod vision, was added to the background. When it was small, but not when it was large, this patch substantially raised the threshold for the test.4. When a similar experiment was made using, instead of a red patch, a short wave-length one that was conspicuous in rod vision, threshold varied similarly with patch size. These results support the notion that the influence of small backgrounds arises in some size-selective mechanism that is indifferent to the receptor system in which visual signals originate. Two corollaries of this hypothesis were tested in further experiments.5. A small patch was chosen so as to lift scotopic threshold substantially above its level on a uniform field. This threshold elevation persisted for minutes after extinction of the patch, but only when the patch was small. A large patch made bright enough to elevate threshold by as much as the small one gave rise to no corresponding after-effect.6. Increment-thresholds for a small red test spot, detected through cones, followed the same course whether a large uniform background was long- or short wave-length. When the background was small, threshold upon the short wave-length one began to rise for much lower levels of background illumination, suggesting the influence of rods. This was confirmed by repeating the experiment after a strong bleach when the cones, but not rods, had fully recovered their sensitivity. Increment-thresholds upon small backgrounds of long or short wave-lengths then followed the same course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 894602      PMCID: PMC1283723          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  14 in total

1.  VISUAL ADAPTATION.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-03-16

2.  Nervous mechanisms and dark-adaptation.

Authors:  G B ARDEN; R A WEALE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The directional and spectral sensitivities of the retinal rods to adapting fields of different wave-lengths.

Authors:  F Flamant; W S Stiles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1948-03-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Convergence of rod and cone signals in the cat's retina.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; B G Hertz; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Background configuration and rod threshold.

Authors:  P Lennie; D I MacLeod
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Quantitative aspects of sensitivity and summation in the cat retina.

Authors:  B G Cleland; C Enroth-cugell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Rod-cone independence for sensitizing interaction in the human retina.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The size of rod signals.

Authors:  M Alpern; W A Rushton; S Torii
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images.

Authors:  C Blakemore; F W Campbell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Spatial interaction in the human retina during scotopic vision.

Authors:  G Westheimer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  The field adaptation of the human rod visual system.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; C C Fach; A Stockman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Parallel Processing of Rod and Cone Signals: Retinal Function and Human Perception.

Authors:  William N Grimes; Adree Songco-Aguas; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.422

3.  Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Jonathan P Greenberg; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  After-effects of small adapting fields.

Authors:  M M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Lateral interactions in human cone dark adaptation.

Authors:  M M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The signal-to-noise characteristics of rod-cone interaction.

Authors:  G M Bauer; T E Frumkes; R W Nygaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Relationship between retinal layer thickness and the visual field in early age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; R Theodore Smith; Donald C Hood; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Retinal morphological and functional changes in an animal model of retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Bin Lu; Catherine W Morgans; Sergey Girman; Raymond Lund; Shaomei Wang
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Influence of background size, luminance and eccentricity on different adaptation mechanisms.

Authors:  Alejandro H Gloriani; Beatriz M Matesanz; Pablo A Barrionuevo; Isabel Arranz; Luis Issolio; Santiago Mar; Juan A Aparicio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.