Literature DB >> 27210038

Influence of background size, luminance and eccentricity on different adaptation mechanisms.

Alejandro H Gloriani1, Beatriz M Matesanz1, Pablo A Barrionuevo2, Isabel Arranz1, Luis Issolio2, Santiago Mar1, Juan A Aparicio3.   

Abstract

Mechanisms of light adaptation have been traditionally explained with reference to psychophysical experimentation. However, the neural substrata involved in those mechanisms remain to be elucidated. Our study analyzed links between psychophysical measurements and retinal physiological evidence with consideration for the phenomena of rod-cone interactions, photon noise, and spatial summation. Threshold test luminances were obtained with steady background fields at mesopic and photopic light levels (i.e., 0.06-110cd/m(2)) for retinal eccentricities from 0° to 15° using three combinations of background/test field sizes (i.e., 10°/2°, 10°/0.45°, and 1°/0.45°). A two-channel Maxwellian view optical system was employed to eliminate pupil effects on the measured thresholds. A model based on visual mechanisms that were described in the literature was optimized to fit the measured luminance thresholds in all experimental conditions. Our results can be described by a combination of visual mechanisms. We determined how spatial summation changed with eccentricity and how subtractive adaptation changed with eccentricity and background field size. According to our model, photon noise plays a significant role to explain contrast detection thresholds measured with the 1/0.45° background/test size combination at mesopic luminances and at off-axis eccentricities. In these conditions, our data reflect the presence of rod-cone interaction for eccentricities between 6° and 9° and luminances between 0.6 and 5cd/m(2). In spite of the increasing noise effects with eccentricity, results also show that the visual system tends to maintain a constant signal-to-noise ratio in the off-axis detection task over the whole mesopic range.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Light adaptation; Photon noise; Psychophysics; Retinal gain control; Rod-cone interaction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27210038      PMCID: PMC4955780          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  58 in total

1.  A temporal model for early vision that explains detection thresholds for light pulses on flickering backgrounds.

Authors:  H P Snippe; L Poot; J H van Hateren
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 2.  Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew Stockman; Lindsay T Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Lateral interactions in the outer retina.

Authors:  Wallace B Thoreson; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  The influence of center-surround antagonism on light adaptation in cones in the retina of the turtle.

Authors:  D A Burkhardt
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 5.  A neural model of foveal light adaptation and afterimage formation.

Authors:  H R Wilson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Rod-cone interaction in light adaptation.

Authors:  M Latch; P Lennie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Color and brightness encoded in a common L- and M-cone pathway with expansive and compressive nonlinearities.

Authors:  Andrew Stockman; Daniela Petrova; G Bruce Henning
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  The signal-to-noise characteristics of rod-cone interaction.

Authors:  G M Bauer; T E Frumkes; R W Nygaard
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Controlling the gain of rod-mediated signals in the Mammalian retina.

Authors:  Felice A Dunn; Thuy Doan; Alapakkam P Sampath; Fred Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Vision under mesopic and scotopic illumination.

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamics of contrast adaptation in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  QD laser eyewear as a visual field aid in a visual field defect model.

Authors:  Chigusa Iyama; Yuta Shigeno; Eri Hirano; Mamoru Kamoshita; Norihiro Nagai; Misa Suzuki; Sakiko Minami; Toshihide Kurihara; Hideki Sonobe; Kazuhiro Watanabe; Hajime Shinoda; Kazuo Tsubota; Yoko Ozawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.