Literature DB >> 3568577

The Sheffield data collection system.

B H Brown, A D Seagar.   

Abstract

Because of the intrinsically low sensitivity of any surface potential measurement to resistivity changes within a volume conductor, any data collection system for impedance imaging must be sensitive to changes in the peripheral potential profile of the order of 0.1%. For example, whilst the resistivity changes associated with lung ventilation and the movement of blood during the cardiac cycle range from 3 to 100% the changes recorded at the surface are very much less than this. The Sheffield data collection system uses 16 electrodes which are addressed through 4 multiplexers. Overall system accuracy is largely determined by the front-end equivalent circuit which is considered in some detail. This equivalent circuit must take into account wiring and multiplexer capacitances. A current drive of 5 mA p-p at 5 kHz is multiplexed to adjacent pairs of electrodes and peripheral potential profiles are recorded by serially stepping around adjacent electrode pairs. The existing Sheffield system collects the 208 data points for one image in 79 ms and offers 10 image data sets per second to the microprocessor. For a homogeneous circular conductor the ratio of the maximum to minimum signals within each peripheral potential profile is 45:1. The temptation to increase the number of electrodes in order to improve resolution is great and an achievable performance for 128 electrodes is given. However, any improvement in spatial resolution can only be made at the expense of speed and sensitivity which may well be the more important factors in determining the clinical utility of APT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3568577     DOI: 10.1088/0143-0815/8/4a/012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0143-0815


  37 in total

1.  Impedance changes during the compound nerve action potential: implications for impedance imaging of neuronal depolarisation in the brain.

Authors:  D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of brain function.

Authors:  D S Holder
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Imaging cardiac activity by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  D Isaacson; J L Mueller; J C Newell; S Siltanen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 4.  [Electrical impedance tomography: ready for routine clinical use for mechanically ventilated patients?].

Authors:  J Hinz; G Hahn; M Quintel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Design of electrodes and current limits for low frequency electrical impedance tomography of the brain.

Authors:  O Gilad; L Horesh; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Applied potential tomography. Noninvasive method for measuring gastric emptying of a solid test meal.

Authors:  Y F Mangnall; D D Kerrigan; A G Johnson; N W Read
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  A novel method for recording neuronal depolarization with recording at 125-825 Hz: implications for imaging fast neural activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  T Oh; O Gilad; A Ghosh; M Schuettler; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Variations in in vivo electrical impedance tomography images due to inaccuracy in boundary representation.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Effect of skin impedance on image quality and variability in electrical impedance tomography: a model study.

Authors:  K G Boone; D S Holder
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Validity and reproducibility of electrical impedance tomography for measurement of calf blood flow in healthy subjects.

Authors:  A Vonk Noordegraaf; P W Kunst; A Janse; R A Smulders; R M Heethaar; P E Postmus; T J Faes; P M de Vries
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.