Literature DB >> 3696021

Direct, standardized assessment of clinical competence.

R G Williams1, H S Barrows, N V Vu, S J Verhulst, J A Colliver, M Marcy, D Steward.   

Abstract

Doctor ratings of clerkship performance are often discounted as not accurately reflecting clinical competence. Such ratings are influenced by the following uncontrolled variables: case difficulty; differing rater focus and standards; lack of agreement on what constitutes acceptable performance; and collective patient care responsibility masks individual contributions. Standardized direct measures of clinical competence were developed to control these factors and allow direct comparisons of student performance. Students saw 18 patients representing frequently occurring and important patient problems. Student actions and decisions were recorded and subsequent responses to questions revealed knowledge of pathophysiology, basis for actions, use and interpretation of laboratory investigations, and management. Actions and responses were graded using a pre-set key. The examination covered 73% of designated clinical competencies. Examinations scores corresponded with independent measures of clinical competence. Reliability studies indicated that new cases can be substituted in subsequent years with confidence that scores will maintain similar meaning. Costs are +6.95 per student per case, which is modest considering the quality and quantity of information acquired. Methods described are practical for evaluation of clerks and residents and for licensing and specialty certification examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3696021     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb01407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

1.  Assessment of competence.

Authors:  L M Campbell; T S Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Assessing clinical competence.

Authors:  P Maguire
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-07

3.  Evaluating internists' clinical competence.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The Standardized Professional Encounter: A New Model to Assess Professionalism and Communication Skills.

Authors:  Scott D Lifchez; Carisa M Cooney; Richard J Redett
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

5.  The use of standardized patients for mock oral board exams in neurology: a pilot study.

Authors:  Brett Kissela; Steven Harris; Dawn Kleindorfer; Christopher Lindsell; Robert Pascuzzi; Daniel Woo; Jerzy Szaflarski; Daniel Kanter; Alex Schneider; Michael Sostok; Joseph Broderick
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Temporal stability of objective structured clinical exams: a longitudinal study employing item response theory.

Authors:  Lubna A Baig; Claudio Violato
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Accuracy of portrayal by standardized patients: results from four OSCE stations conducted for high stakes examinations.

Authors:  Lubna A Baig; Tanya N Beran; Andrea Vallevand; Zarrukh A Baig; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.