Literature DB >> 8942954

Memory systems in the brain and localization of a memory.

R F Thompson1, J J Kim.   

Abstract

It is now clear that there are a number of different forms or aspects of learning and memory that involve different brain systems. Broadly, memory phenomena have been categorized as explicit or implicit. Thus, explicit memories for experience involve the hippocampus-medial temporal lobe system and implicit basic associative learning and memory involves the cerebellum, amygdala, and other systems. Under normal conditions, however, many of these brain-memory systems are engaged to some degree in learning situations. But each of these brain systems is learning something different about the situation. The cerebellum is necessary for classical conditioning of discrete behavioral responses (eyeblink, limb flexion) under all conditions; however, in the "trace" procedure where a period of no stimuli intervenes between the conditioned stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus the hippocampus plays a critical role. Trace conditioning appears to provide a simple model of explicit memory where analysis of brain substrates is feasible. Analysis of the role of the cerebellum in basic delay conditioning (stimuli overlap) indicates that the memories are formed and stored in the cerebellum. The phenomenon of cerebellar long-term depression is considered as a putative mechanism of memory storage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942954      PMCID: PMC33628          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  78 in total

1.  Long-term potentiation in the interpositus and vestibular nuclei in the rat.

Authors:  R J Racine; D A Wilson; R Gingell; D Sunderland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  M D Mauk; J E Steinmetz; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; C G Logan; D J Rosen; J K Thompson; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5.

Authors:  R G Morris; E Anderson; G S Lynch; M Baudry
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Feb 27-Mar 5       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Cerebellar GABAergic processes: evidence for critical involvement in a form of simple associative learning in the rabbit.

Authors:  L A Mamounas; R F Thompson; J Madden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Normal olfactory discrimination learning set and facilitation of reversal learning after medial-temporal damage in rats: implications for an account of preserved learning abilities in amnesia.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A Fagan; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; D J Rosen; P F Chapman; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Separation of hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in temporal memory dysfunctions.

Authors:  D S Olton; W H Meck; R M Church
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1987-02-24       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Hippocampus and trace conditioning of the rabbit's classically conditioned nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  P R Solomon; E R Vander Schaaf; R F Thompson; D J Weisz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Conditioning-specific membrane changes of rabbit hippocampal neurons measured in vitro.

Authors:  J F Disterhoft; D A Coulter; D L Alkon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  59 in total

1.  Differential activation of adenylyl cyclases by spatial and procedural learning.

Authors:  J L Guillou; G M Rose; D M Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Amygdala is critical for stress-induced modulation of hippocampal long-term potentiation and learning.

Authors:  J J Kim; H J Lee; J S Han; M G Packard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Receptive field plasticity profoundly alters the cutaneous parallel fiber synaptic input to cerebellar interneurons in vivo.

Authors:  Henrik Jörntell; Carl-Fredrik Ekerot
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  fMRI of the conscious rabbit during unilateral classical eyeblink conditioning reveals bilateral cerebellar activation.

Authors:  Michael J Miller; Nan-kuei Chen; Limin Li; Brian Tom; Craig Weiss; John F Disterhoft; Alice M Wyrwicz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Parallel fiber receptive fields: a key to understanding cerebellar operation and learning.

Authors:  Carl-Fredrik Ekerot; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Time-dependent reorganization of the brain components underlying memory retention in trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Kaori Takehara; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A biophysical model of synaptic delay learning and temporal pattern recognition in a cerebellar Purkinje cell.

Authors:  Volker Steuber; David Willshaw
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Stimulus-response versus stimulus-stimulus-response learning in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  S Richter; K Matthies; T Ohde; A Dimitrova; E Gizewski; A Beck; V Aurich; D Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Learning during stressful times.

Authors:  Tracey J Shors
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.