Literature DB >> 15221174

Stimulus-response versus stimulus-stimulus-response learning in cerebellar patients.

S Richter1, K Matthies, T Ohde, A Dimitrova, E Gizewski, A Beck, V Aurich, D Timmann.   

Abstract

Ample evidence exists that the cerebellum is involved in associative motor learning, particularly in eyeblink-conditioning. In visuomotor associative learning the role of the cerebellum is less clear. One open question is whether cerebellar patients' deficits in visuomotor learning are present both in a stimulus-response and a stimulus-stimulus-response association task. Twelve patients with cerebellar degeneration and 12 healthy matched control subjects participated. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric analysis of the cerebellum was performed to assess the degree of cerebellar atrophy. In a blocked design, subjects had to learn the association between one color square or two color squares and a right or left key press. In the latter condition, the two colors were shown one after the other in the same sequence except for two blocks at the end of the experiment. Overall, cerebellar subjects reacted significantly slower than controls. In both groups, reaction time decreased over blocks, and the learning effect was more pronounced in the stimulus-response than in the stimulus-stimulus-response condition. Post hoc analyses revealed that learning differences between conditions were significant in cerebellar patients but not control subjects. Furthermore, only healthy subjects were irritated, i.e., they significantly increased reaction times in the blocks with reversed sequence in the stimulus-stimulus-response condition. Cerebellar subjects tended to name less correct stimulus-stimulus-response associations after the experiment. Finally, cerebellar volume correlated with parameters of motor performance, but not learning. In conclusion, cerebellar patients showed deficits in stimulus-stimulus-response, but not stimulus-response learning. Future experiments are needed to differentiate between possible deficits in learning the stimulus-stimulus association, use of sequence information, and/or impaired motor performance interfering with learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15221174     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1920-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

Review 1.  Arbitrary associations between antecedents and actions.

Authors:  S P Wise; E A Murray
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differences in trace and delay visuomotor associative learning in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Matthias Maschke; Johannes Drepper; Katja Bürgerhoff; Sandra Calabrese; Florian P Kolb; Irene Daum; Hans-Christoph Diener; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Right temporal-lobe damage. Perception of unfamiliar stimuli after damage.

Authors:  D KIMURA
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1963-03

Review 5.  Associative learning.

Authors:  R F Thompson; S Bao; L Chen; B D Cipriano; J S Grethe; J J Kim; J K Thompson; J A Tracy; M S Weninger; D J Krupa
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.230

6.  Motor deficits cannot explain impaired cognitive associative learning in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Dagmar Timmann; J Drepper; M Maschke; F P Kolb; D Böring; A F Thilmann; H C Diener
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 7.  Cerebellar contributions to cognition.

Authors:  I Daum; H Ackermann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  [Kimura's recurring figures test: standardization on a german population-sample (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Hartje; H Rixecker
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  M Molinari; M G Leggio; A Solida; R Ciorra; S Misciagna; M C Silveri; L Petrosini
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Cerebellum activation associated with performance change but not motor learning.

Authors:  R D Seidler; A Purushotham; S-G Kim; K Uğurbil; D Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Acquisition of simple auditory and visual sequences in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Markus Frings; Matthias Maschke; Marcus Gerwig; Hans-Christoph Diener; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Comparison of the electrically evoked leg withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  T F B Kolb; S Lachauer; B Schoch; M Gerwig; D Timmann; F P Kolb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Evaluation of a new approach for semi-automatic segmentation of the cerebellum in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Katrin Weier; Andreas Beck; Stefano Magon; Michael Amann; Yvonne Naegelin; Iris K Penner; Markus Thürling; Volker Aurich; Tobias Derfuss; Ernst-Wilhelm Radue; Christoph Stippich; Ludwig Kappos; Dagmar Timmann; Till Sprenger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Sequence learning is preserved in individuals with cerebellar degeneration when the movements are directly cued.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.