Literature DB >> 8942376

Effect of a cataract simulation on clinical and real world vision.

D B Elliott1, M A Bullimore, A E Patla, D Whitaker.   

Abstract

AIMS/
BACKGROUND: Many reports have indicated that some patients with cataract can retain good visual acuity but complain of significant visual problems. This is the first in a series of papers trying to determine what causes these symptoms and whether other clinical tests can predict the real world vision loss.
METHODS: The effect of a cataract simulation with a similar angular distribution of light scatter as real cataract on clinical (visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare) and real world vision (face recognition, reading speed, and mobility orientation) was investigated.
RESULTS: The simulation had a relatively small effect on visual acuity (6/6 with the simulation), but much larger effects on contrast sensitivity and low contrast acuity with and without glare. The simulation had no effect on high luminance and high contrast real world tasks, such as mobility orientation in room light and optimal reading speed. A small, but significant deterioration was found for the slightly lower contrast task of face and expression recognition. However, under low luminance conditions, substantial defects in mobility orientation were obtained (despite 6/6 acuity).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the relative effect of the cataract simulation on acuity and contrast tasks is not typical of the average cataract, it can be found in those cataract patients with visual problems despite good visual acuity. This corroborates the suggestion that it is large amounts of wide angle light scatter (forward and/or backward) which are at least partly responsible for visual disability in cataract patients with good visual acuity. A patient's reported visual disability may depend on the percentage of time he or she spends under low contrast and/or low luminance conditions, such as walking or reading in dim illumination, and walking or driving at night, in fog, or heavy rain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942376      PMCID: PMC505615          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.9.799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  25 in total

1.  The influence of simulated light scattering on automated perimetric threshold measurements.

Authors:  D K Heuer; D R Anderson; R W Knighton; W J Feuer; M G Gressel
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09

2.  Contribution of vision variables to mobility in age-related maculopathy patients.

Authors:  B Brown; L Brabyn; L Welch; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy; A Colenbrander
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-09

3.  Psychophysics of reading--V. The role of contrast in normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; G S Rubin; A Luebker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Degradation of vision through a simulated cataract.

Authors:  J L Zuckerman; D Miller; W Dyes; M Keller
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1973-03

5.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; I L Bailey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Psychophysics of reading--I. Normal vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; D G Pelli; G S Rubin; M M Schleske
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Visual functioning in cataract patients. Methods of measuring and results.

Authors:  P Bernth-Petersen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1981-04

8.  Brightness acuity test and outdoor visual acuity in cataract patients.

Authors:  J T Holladay; T C Prager; J Trujillo; R S Ruiz
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Contrast sensitivity, acuity, and the perception of 'real-world' targets.

Authors:  C Owsley; M E Sloane
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance.

Authors:  J A Marron; I L Bailey
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-05
View more
  10 in total

1.  Effects of yellow filters on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and reading under conditions of forward light scatter.

Authors:  Frank Eperjesi; Lillian Evangelica Agelis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effect of yellow filter on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under glare condition among different age groups.

Authors:  Monireh Mahjoob; Samira Heydarian; Somayyeh Koochi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Genetic influence on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged male twins.

Authors:  Alice Cronin-Golomb; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; Michael D Grant; Kristen C Jacobson; Seth A Eisen; Thomas M Laudate; William S Kremen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Improvements in clinical and functional vision and perceived visual disability after first and second eye cataract surgery.

Authors:  D B Elliott; A Patla; M A Bullimore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Development of a battery of functional tests for low vision.

Authors:  Bradley E Dougherty; Scott R Martin; Corey B Kelly; Lisa A Jones; Thomas W Raasch; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Falls and postural control in older adults with cataracts.

Authors:  Afsun Nodehi Moghadam; Maryam Goudarzian; Farhad Azadi; Seide Masume Hosseini; Zahra Mosallanezhad; Nouraddin Karimi; Yassin Larne; Maryam Habibi; Poorya Yaghmaei
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-09-27

7.  The Effect of Induced Intraocular Stray Light on Recognition Thresholds for Pseudo-High-Pass Filtered Letters.

Authors:  Nilpa Shah; Steven C Dakin; Pádraig J Mulholland; Kalina Racheva; Juliane Matlach; Roger S Anderson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.048

8.  Blur Unblurred-A Mini Tutorial.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-04-18

9.  Effect of Varying Levels of Glare on Contrast Sensitivity Measurements of Young Healthy Individuals Under Photopic and Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Steven M Thurman; Aaron R Seitz; Pinakin G Davey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-14

10.  Changes in patient subjective happiness and satisfaction with cataract surgery.

Authors:  Erisa Yotsukura; Masahiko Ayaki; Naohisa Nezu; Hidemasa Torii; Hiroyuki Arai; Keiko Sakatani; Kazuo Tsubota; Kazuno Negishi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.