Literature DB >> 8939841

Routine cholangiography reduces sequelae of common bile duct injuries.

B J Carroll1, R L Friedman, M A Liberman, E H Phillips.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An effort was made to determine whether a policy of routine cholangiography affects the incidence, morbidity, and cost of bile duct injuries.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive 3,242 laparoscopic cholecystectomies was performed. Most patients had routine intraoperative cholangiography.
RESULTS: There were 12 bile duct injuries (0.37%). All injuries were Bismuth levels 1 and 2. Eleven of 12 injuries were recognized intraoperatively. Ten were repaired primarily and one required hepaticojejunostomy. All repairs were successful. Average hospital charges were $26,669. One of 12 patients had delayed recognition of a bile duct injury and underwent primary repair over a T-tube on postoperative day 7. Hospital charges were $43,957.
CONCLUSION: Routine cholangiography did not appear to decrease the absolute incidence of bile duct injuries compared to previously published reports. Injury severity, morbidity, late sequelae, and costs were reduced by a policy of routine cholangiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8939841     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in routine practice: duct injury as an index event.

Authors:  T F Gorey; P Papasavas
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery.

Authors:  V Bresadola; S Intini; G Terrosu; U Baccarani; M G Marcellino; M Sistu; F Scanavacca; F Bresadola
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Iatrogenic bile duct injuries.

Authors:  P R Savassi-Rocha; S R Almeida; M D Sanches; M A C Andrade; J T Frerreira; M T C Diniz; A L S Rocha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the new millennium.

Authors:  J B Lichten; J J Reid; M P Zahalsky; R L Friedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Avoiding biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical considerations.

Authors:  M P Callery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography in patients whose biliary tree was evaluated preoperatively by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Kimihiko Ueno; Tetsuo Ajiki; Hidehiro Sawa; Ippei Matsumoto; Takumi Fukumoto; Yonson Ku
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting: a simplified approach to the management of occult common bile duct stones.

Authors:  R D Fanelli; K S Gersin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Retrograde tracing along "cystic duct" method to prevent biliary misidentification injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Chen; Bin Cheng; Dong Wang; Wenjun Zhang; Dafei Dai; Weidong Zhang; Beibei Yu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.