Literature DB >> 11443457

Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy during residency in general surgery.

V Bresadola1, S Intini, G Terrosu, U Baccarani, M G Marcellino, M Sistu, F Scanavacca, F Bresadola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography (IC) in the diagnosis of asymptomatic choledocholithiasis is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic-therapeutic impact and the educational implications of this method for residents specializing in general surgery.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 835 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis without choledocholithiasis. IC was routinely performed by both expert surgeons and residents in general surgery.
RESULTS: The cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 804 cases, but conversion to open surgery was required in 31 cases. IC was not completed in 140 cases (17.4%), and in 44 cases it revealed a suspected choledocholithiasis. The stones were treated via laparoscopy in 36 cases, laparotomy in six cases, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in two cases. Five patients were not diagnosed wit h choledocholithiasis. In one case, a lesion of the choledochus was discovered and treated laparoscopically. A total of 610 IC were done by expert surgeons and 225 by residents. The duration of the cholecystectomy with IC was significantly different between the two groups (76.9 +/- 12 vs 92.4 +/- 11), as was the feasibility index (88.6% vs 80.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic IC is a safe and accurate procedure for the diagnosis of unrecognized choledocholithiasis. Teaching of this procedure as part of the specialization in general surgery would be opportune because it would provide surgical residents with an additional tool for the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology of the common bile duct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11443457     DOI: 10.1007/s004640090006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Kullman; K Borch; E Lindström; J Svanvik; B Anderberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic cholangiography: a prospective study.

Authors:  A J Sabharwal; E J Minford; L P Marson; I M Muir; D Hill; C D Auld
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct: beyond the learning curve.

Authors:  N J Keeling; D Menzies; R W Motson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  K P Koo; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Management of bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: appraisal of routine operative cholangiography and endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  E Kullman; K Borch; E Lindström; J Svanvik; B Anderberg
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-11

6.  Routine cholangiography reduces sequelae of common bile duct injuries.

Authors:  B J Carroll; R L Friedman; M A Liberman; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 734 consecutive cases.

Authors:  L T Ladocsi; L D Benitez; D R Filippone; F C Nance
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 9.  Diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does the surgeon's experience influence the outcome of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones?

Authors:  Astrid Herrero; Claire Philippe; Françoise Guillon; Bertrand Millat; Frédéric Borie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Training higher surgical trainees in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  Matthew G Tutton; Nikhil Pawa; Tan H A Arulampalam; Roger W Motson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic, three-port and SILS cholecystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Agrusa; G Romano; G Cucinella; G Cocorullo; S Bonventre; G Salamone; G Di Buono; G De Vita; G Frazzetta; D Chianetta; V Sorce; G Bellanca; G Gulotta
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

4.  Incidence of residual choledocholithiasis detected by intraoperative cholangiography at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients having undergone preoperative ERCP.

Authors:  Richard A Pierce; Sreenivasa Jonnalagadda; Jennifer A Spitler; Deron J Tessier; Jane M Liaw; Shelly C Lall; Lora M Melman; Margaret M Frisella; Laura M Todt; L Michael Brunt; Valerie J Halpin; J Christopher Eagon; Steven A Edmundowicz; Brent D Matthews
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Predictive Factors for Drain Placement After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Giacomo Calini; Pier Paolo Brollo; Rosanna Quattrin; Vittorio Bresadola
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.