Literature DB >> 8018609

Specificity of antenatal ultrasound in the Yorkshire Region: a prospective study of 2261 ultrasound detected anomalies.

I R Brand1, P Kaminopetros, M Cave, H C Irving, R J Lilford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the specificity of the ultrasound diagnosis of fetal anomalies. Pregnancies which proceeded to termination and ultrasound-diagnosed fetal anomalies which were not offered termination were considered.
DESIGN: Prospective, region-wide study over three and a half years.
SETTING: Cases were identified through 25 ultrasound departments representing the 15 districts in the Yorkshire Region.
SUBJECTS: Pregnant women with an ultrasound-diagnosed fetal anomaly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information obtained from the ultrasound report was compared with the outcomes determined by cytogenetics, postmortem or paediatric examination.
RESULTS: Of 2261 pregnancies with an ultrasound-diagnosed fetal anomaly 369, (16%) were terminated and 357 (97%) were followed by postmortem examination. Ultrasound findings exactly matched those of the postmortem or were accompanied by additional anomalies in 325 cases (91%). In 32 cases ultrasound findings were not confirmed by postmortem, but in 30 of these the decision to offer termination remained justified because the correct diagnosis was judged equally or more serious. Two (0.5%) were terminated for an anomaly which subsequently proved less severe than predicted on ultrasound. Ultrasound significantly over- or under-diagnosed a major fetal anomaly in 27 of the 1139 (2.4%) cases in which an anomaly was detected, but the pregnancy was not terminated.
CONCLUSION: Termination of pregnancy was based on the correct prognosis in over 99.5% of cases. This does not obviate the need for pathological examination of the fetus which changed or refined the diagnosis in 35% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8018609     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb11910.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  7 in total

1.  Need for national fetal screening programme for congenital anomalies.

Authors:  K L Narasimhan; Rizwan A Khan
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Commentary: evidence based practice and antenatal ultrasonography--the need for more studies.

Authors:  P Chamberlain; P A Boyd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

3.  Prenatal indices for mandibular retrognathia/micrognathia.

Authors:  J Neuschulz; L Wilhelm; H Christ; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 4.  Vesicoamniotic shunting for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: an overview.

Authors:  R K Morris; K S Khan; M D Kilby
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 5.  Fetal counselling for congenital malformations.

Authors:  Kokila Lakhoo
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 2.003

6.  [Confrontation between ultrasound and fetopathological examination following therapeutic abortion performed in a maternity clinic in Tunisia].

Authors:  Mehdi Kehila; Ahmed Halouani; Omar Touhami; Hassine Saber Abouda; Abdeljalil Khlifi; Rim Ben Hmid; Ines Benhassen; Aida Masmoudi; Mohamed Badis Chanoufi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-12-21

7.  Evaluation of prenatal central nervous system anomalies: obstetric management, fetal outcomes and chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Ann Gee Tan; Neha Sethi; Sofiah Sulaiman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.