Literature DB >> 8938659

Differences in the prejunctional effects of methacholine and pilocarpine on the release of endogenous acetylcholine from guinea-pig trachea.

R E ten Berge1, E C Weening, A F Roffel, J Zaagsma.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of the full muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist methacholine and the partial and putatively M2-selective agonist pilocarpine on endogenous acetylcholine release from guinea-pig trachea by use of high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Atropine-induced increases in acetylcholine release were used to monitor the system. Electrical field stimulation (8 V, 30 Hz, 0.5 ms for 5 min)-induced acetylcholine release in the presence of neostigmine, with or without preincubation with choline to maximally enhance acetylcholine output, was increased to about 225% by 0.3 microM atropine, indicating functional autoinhibition. However, methacholine (10 microM) did not affect the acetylcholine release, whereas it was enhanced to 166% by 30 microM pilocarpine. When electrical field stimulation was applied at lower intensity (8 V, 16 Hz, 0.1 ms for 5 min) and in the absence of neostigmine, and increase by 0.3 microM atropine (to 177%) but a decrease of the acetylcholine release by 10 microM methacholine (to 65%) and 30 microM pilocarpine (to 63%) were observed. These results clearly demonstrate (i) that inhibition of evoked endogenous acetylcholine release from prejunctional nerve terminals in guinea-pig trachea can only be demonstrated under conditions of low junctional concentrations of acetylcholine, and (ii) that pilocarpine, as a partial muscarinic agonist, behaves as an antagonist under high junctional concentrations of the neurotransmitter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8938659     DOI: 10.1007/bf00170835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol        ISSN: 0028-1298            Impact factor:   3.000


  17 in total

1.  Actions of methoctramine, a muscarinic M2 receptor antagonist, on muscarinic and nicotinic cholinoceptors in guinea-pig airways in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  N Watson; P J Barnes; J Maclagan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  A simple, sensitive, and economic assay for choline and acetylcholine using HPLC, an enzyme reactor, and an electrochemical detector.

Authors:  G Damsma; B H Westerink; A S Horn
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.372

3.  Presynaptic inhibition of acetylcholine release.

Authors:  P Aas; F Fonnum
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1986-07

4.  Evidence for the involvement of prostaglandins in modulation of acetylcholine release from canine bronchial tissue.

Authors:  I A Deckers; M Rampart; H Bult; A G Herman
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-08-29       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Dysfunction of M2-muscarinic receptors in pulmonary parasympathetic nerves after antigen challenge.

Authors:  A D Fryer; M Wills-Karp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1991-12

6.  Acetylcholine and choline in neuronal tissue measured by HPLC with electrochemical detection.

Authors:  P E Potter; J L Meek; N H Neff
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.372

7.  Different approaches to study acetylcholine release: endogenous ACh versus tritium efflux.

Authors:  L Beani; C Bianchi; A Siniscalchi; L Sivilotti; S Tanganelli; E Veratti
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Postganglionic muscarinic inhibitory receptors in pulmonary parasympathetic nerves in the guinea-pig.

Authors:  D Faulkner; A D Fryer; J Maclagan
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Prejunctional inhibitory muscarinic receptors on cholinergic nerves in human and guinea pig airways.

Authors:  P A Minette; P J Barnes
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-06

10.  Differences between the release of radiolabelled and endogenous dopamine from superfused rat brain slices: effects of depolarizing stimuli, amphetamine and synthesis inhibition.

Authors:  H Herdon; J Strupish; S R Nahorski
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-12-02       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.